Russian language textbook as agent of change: from USSR to the new century

The relevance of studying the linguistic parameters of the text in the Russian language textbook as a separate genre is determined, on the one hand, by the absence of clear linguistic criteria for a standard textbook in Russian studies, and on the other hand, by the increased criticism of the textbook language after the revision of the Federal State Educational Standard. The research is aimed at identifying differences and similarities of Russian language textbooks for 5th graders published in 1935-1974 and 2012-2015. Consistent description, analysis of their structure, content, and language with methods of corpus linguistics, text analytics and automatic profiling with RuLingva analyzer confirmed our hypothesis that representing the same genre, Russian language textbooks of the two historical periods have linguistic differences. The authors proved that the composition common to all textbooks - linguistic theory, texts of assignments and exercises, artistic and educational texts of exercises - varies significantly in size and communicative strategies. Compositional similarity realized in all textbooks in sequential arrangement of theory and exercises, is not found only in the oldest textbook of 1935 by Shapiro, which has separate chapters for rules and exercises. The modern textbooks differ mostly in texts of instructions which are 2.5 times longer than in Soviet textbooks; their motivational questions have a tendency to dialogism. Directives in Soviet textbooks contain traditional incentives in the form of direct verbal imperatives. Illustrative sources of modern textbooks are more various and include research texts from humanities, natural sciences, and turn-of-the-century fiction. Much more diverse typography of modern textbooks contributes to text comprehension. The prospects of the study imply identifying the content preferences of the authors of textbooks of the two periods and systematic parameterization of the textbooks vocabulary, its lexical-syntactic and discourse analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian language studies
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2024-22-4-540-554
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Innovations and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Russian language textbook as agent of change: from USSR to the new century

Marina I. Solnyshkina, Evgeniya Nicolaevna Bulina, Yulia N. Ebzeeva
1 citations
Russian language studies
Educational Innovations and Challenges
0.78
article

Russian language textbook as agent of change: from USSR to the new century

Marina I. Solnyshkina, Evgeniya Nicolaevna Bulina, Yulia N. Ebzeeva
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The relevance of studying the linguistic parameters of the text in the Russian language textbook as a separate genre is determined, on the one hand, by the absence of clear linguistic criteria for a standard textbook in Russian studies, and on the other hand, by the increased criticism of the textbook language after the revision of the Federal State Educational Standard. The research is aimed at identifying differences and similarities of Russian language textbooks for 5th graders published in 1935-1974 and 2012-2015. Consistent description, analysis of their structure, content, and language with methods of corpus linguistics, text analytics and automatic profiling with RuLingva analyzer confirmed our hypothesis that representing the same genre, Russian language textbooks of the two historical periods have linguistic differences. The authors proved that the composition common to all textbooks - linguistic theory, texts of assignments and exercises, artistic and educational texts of exercises - varies significantly in size and communicative strategies. Compositional similarity realized in all textbooks in sequential arrangement of theory and exercises, is not found only in the oldest textbook of 1935 by Shapiro, which has separate chapters for rules and exercises. The modern textbooks differ mostly in texts of instructions which are 2.5 times longer than in Soviet textbooks; their motivational questions have a tendency to dialogism. Directives in Soviet textbooks contain traditional incentives in the form of direct verbal imperatives. Illustrative sources of modern textbooks are more various and include research texts from humanities, natural sciences, and turn-of-the-century fiction. Much more diverse typography of modern textbooks contributes to text comprehension. The prospects of the study imply identifying the content preferences of the authors of textbooks of the two periods and systematic parameterization of the textbooks vocabulary, its lexical-syntactic and discourse analysis.

Russian language studiesVol. 22(4)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RU), Kazan Federal University (RU)
Kazan Federal University, RUDN University
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Educational Innovations and Challenges
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.