Features of the Water Policy of Armenia and Azerbaijan: A Comparative Analysis

Armenia and Azerbaijan, when in Soviet Union, had adhered to common principles of water management and provided unified statistical reporting on water use. However, after gaining independence, these states developed their own water laws and stopped exchanging data obtained by national hydrometeorological agencies. The new regional reality and complex relations between the two countries hindered the development of common mechanisms for transboundary water management, which led to negative consequences for the environment. Water quality and its effective management have become one of the acute corners of unresolved problems existing between the two states. This study is devoted to the study of water policies of Armenia and Azerbaijan. The effectiveness and shortcomings of water management in these countries are analyzed. An attempt is made to determine how effective the process of implementing the principles of integrated water resources management is. Based on a comparative analysis of the water management of Armenia and Azerbaijan, analogies and differences in the legislation of water policy and political mechanisms of water use in these countries are established.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RUDN Journal of Political Science
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2025-27-1-116-128
Primary Topic
Transboundary Water Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Features of the Water Policy of Armenia and Azerbaijan: A Comparative Analysis

Larisa M. Aleksanyan
RUDN Journal of Political Science
Transboundary Water Resource Management
article

Features of the Water Policy of Armenia and Azerbaijan: A Comparative Analysis

Larisa M. Aleksanyan
article en

Abstract

Armenia and Azerbaijan, when in Soviet Union, had adhered to common principles of water management and provided unified statistical reporting on water use. However, after gaining independence, these states developed their own water laws and stopped exchanging data obtained by national hydrometeorological agencies. The new regional reality and complex relations between the two countries hindered the development of common mechanisms for transboundary water management, which led to negative consequences for the environment. Water quality and its effective management have become one of the acute corners of unresolved problems existing between the two states. This study is devoted to the study of water policies of Armenia and Azerbaijan. The effectiveness and shortcomings of water management in these countries are analyzed. An attempt is made to determine how effective the process of implementing the principles of integrated water resources management is. Based on a comparative analysis of the water management of Armenia and Azerbaijan, analogies and differences in the legislation of water policy and political mechanisms of water use in these countries are established.

RUDN Journal of Political ScienceVol. 27(1)
Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Transboundary Water Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Features of the Water Policy of Armenia and Azerbaijan: A Comparative Analysis — Larisa M. Aleksanyan · RUDN Journal of Political Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS