Interpreting the Critique of Pure Reason in Argentina: The Beginnings of Kantian Philosophy at the University of Buenos Aires

The research explores the origins of Kantian philosophy at the University of Buenos Aires by focusing on the work of Mario Caimi. Although shifts in Caimi’s emphases and perspectives can be traced over time, this study argues that a consistent orientation underlies his research: the problem of method as the guiding thread of Kant’s philosophy. This interpretative line, inaugurated by Caimi, has decisively shaped the development of Kantian studies at the University of Buenos Aires, establishing a distinctive hermeneutic framework that has since been taken up and further developed by members of the Kant Research Group in Buenos Aires. Through an analysis of key moments in Caimi’s reading of Kant - ranging from the Transcendental Aesthetic to the Transcendental Dialectic - this study aims to demonstrate how the focus on philosophical method reveals a coherent interpretative strategy. It also highlights two defining features of Caimi’s exegesis: the rejection of psychologistic interpretations of Kant, and the insistence on the centrality of sensibility, particularly with respect to the role of sensation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RUDN Journal of Philosophy
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2025-29-3-762-774
Primary Topic
Philosophical Thought and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpreting the Critique of Pure Reason in Argentina: The Beginnings of Kantian Philosophy at the University of Buenos Aires

Laura Alejandra Pelegrín
RUDN Journal of Philosophy
Philosophical Thought and Analysis
article

Interpreting the Critique of Pure Reason in Argentina: The Beginnings of Kantian Philosophy at the University of Buenos Aires

Laura Alejandra Pelegrín
article en

Abstract

The research explores the origins of Kantian philosophy at the University of Buenos Aires by focusing on the work of Mario Caimi. Although shifts in Caimi’s emphases and perspectives can be traced over time, this study argues that a consistent orientation underlies his research: the problem of method as the guiding thread of Kant’s philosophy. This interpretative line, inaugurated by Caimi, has decisively shaped the development of Kantian studies at the University of Buenos Aires, establishing a distinctive hermeneutic framework that has since been taken up and further developed by members of the Kant Research Group in Buenos Aires. Through an analysis of key moments in Caimi’s reading of Kant - ranging from the Transcendental Aesthetic to the Transcendental Dialectic - this study aims to demonstrate how the focus on philosophical method reveals a coherent interpretative strategy. It also highlights two defining features of Caimi’s exegesis: the rejection of psychologistic interpretations of Kant, and the insistence on the centrality of sensibility, particularly with respect to the role of sensation.

RUDN Journal of PhilosophyVol. 29(3)
Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Philosophical Thought and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.