The Sociology of Karl Mannheim’s Knowledge and the Methodological Foundations of the History of Socio-Political Ideas

The methodological principles of K. Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge still have fundamental significance for the study of the history of ideas (and the history of political thought). This significance is determined, firstly, by the critical attitude inherited by Mannheim from the Marxist tradition. In this case, however, criticism is not aimed at simplistically linear “exposure” of the social orientation of ideas, where the content of the latter is explained as a simple function of the author’s predilections and group interests that determine these predilections - and the desired source of the ideological content of the concept, therefore, can be found in the sphere of the “natural” action of common social causes. The critical analysis is focused on understanding the “existential” rootedness of ideas. The analysis suggests that theory is not only and not so many ideas per se, but also the author’s lived attitude to the specific historical conditions of their existence. It is the identification of this kind of rootedness that prevent the content reduction of the author’s position to purely subjective, psychological moments of the experience. The authors suggests that the conceptualization of the rootedness can be carried out on the basis of the “hermeneutic circle” and “anticipation” in the Heidegger-Gadamer “ontological” interpretation of them, as well as through the application of the “life-world” in the Schutz’ interpretation. Ultimately, the study was designed to determine that it is due the heuristic possibilities of such interpretations that the actual socio-cultural meaning of the concept, not necessarily realized by the creator himself, saturated with normative, evaluative, subjective content, but tied to an objective tradition, can be identified and understood. In addition, the authors consider as a promising research task the possibility of strengthening the methodological completeness of the sociology of knowledge by the historical and conceptual approach of R. Koselleck, which would ensure a more thorough alignment of the socio-normative tradition with the problems of a specific theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RUDN Journal of Political Science
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2024-26-4-685-699
Primary Topic
German Social Sciences and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Sociology of Karl Mannheim’s Knowledge and the Methodological Foundations of the History of Socio-Political Ideas

Vasilisa Kuznetsova, Alexander A. Chanyshev
RUDN Journal of Political Science
German Social Sciences and History
article

The Sociology of Karl Mannheim’s Knowledge and the Methodological Foundations of the History of Socio-Political Ideas

Vasilisa Kuznetsova, Alexander A. Chanyshev
article en

Abstract

The methodological principles of K. Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge still have fundamental significance for the study of the history of ideas (and the history of political thought). This significance is determined, firstly, by the critical attitude inherited by Mannheim from the Marxist tradition. In this case, however, criticism is not aimed at simplistically linear “exposure” of the social orientation of ideas, where the content of the latter is explained as a simple function of the author’s predilections and group interests that determine these predilections - and the desired source of the ideological content of the concept, therefore, can be found in the sphere of the “natural” action of common social causes. The critical analysis is focused on understanding the “existential” rootedness of ideas. The analysis suggests that theory is not only and not so many ideas per se, but also the author’s lived attitude to the specific historical conditions of their existence. It is the identification of this kind of rootedness that prevent the content reduction of the author’s position to purely subjective, psychological moments of the experience. The authors suggests that the conceptualization of the rootedness can be carried out on the basis of the “hermeneutic circle” and “anticipation” in the Heidegger-Gadamer “ontological” interpretation of them, as well as through the application of the “life-world” in the Schutz’ interpretation. Ultimately, the study was designed to determine that it is due the heuristic possibilities of such interpretations that the actual socio-cultural meaning of the concept, not necessarily realized by the creator himself, saturated with normative, evaluative, subjective content, but tied to an objective tradition, can be identified and understood. In addition, the authors consider as a promising research task the possibility of strengthening the methodological completeness of the sociology of knowledge by the historical and conceptual approach of R. Koselleck, which would ensure a more thorough alignment of the socio-normative tradition with the problems of a specific theory.

RUDN Journal of Political ScienceVol. 26(4)
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
German Social Sciences and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.