The Problem of Expression of Speculative Concreteness in the “Phenomenology of Spirit” and Hegel’s Understanding of the Nature and Limits of Philosophical Knowledge

The research analyzes such an aspect of the «Phenomenology of Spirit» as the influence of the search for a form of expression of the «experience of consciousness» on the formation of the notion of philosophy. The basis of Hegel’s search is the idea of the identity of thought and language, which is reflected in the «inner speech». Testing the content of «experience» by speech removes from philosophy everything that goes beyond the limits of thought. However, in each of the three «circles» of «Phenomenology», «inner speech» is insufficient to express speculative concreteness. In these fragments, the form of the description approaches the model of philosophy, which was associated in the culture of the Hegelian era with intellectual intuition. The rejection of intuition and the describing of the content of self-consciousness in the process of its social activity create the danger of losing the unity, which is an essential feature of philosophical knowledge. Hegel finds a solution to this problem in building a composition of the work that is based on the consistent distinction and interaction of the subjects of «experience», which play a different role in moving towards the common purpose. As a result, the various socio-cultural content of «experience» in «recollection-inwardizing» takes the form of a «concept», that is accepted by Hegel as adequate to the nature of philosophical knowledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RUDN Journal of Philosophy
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-4-1141-1155
Primary Topic
Critical Theory and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Problem of Expression of Speculative Concreteness in the “Phenomenology of Spirit” and Hegel’s Understanding of the Nature and Limits of Philosophical Knowledge

Vyacheslav Ivanovich Korotkikh
RUDN Journal of Philosophy
Critical Theory and Philosophy
article

The Problem of Expression of Speculative Concreteness in the “Phenomenology of Spirit” and Hegel’s Understanding of the Nature and Limits of Philosophical Knowledge

Vyacheslav Ivanovich Korotkikh
article en

Abstract

The research analyzes such an aspect of the «Phenomenology of Spirit» as the influence of the search for a form of expression of the «experience of consciousness» on the formation of the notion of philosophy. The basis of Hegel’s search is the idea of the identity of thought and language, which is reflected in the «inner speech». Testing the content of «experience» by speech removes from philosophy everything that goes beyond the limits of thought. However, in each of the three «circles» of «Phenomenology», «inner speech» is insufficient to express speculative concreteness. In these fragments, the form of the description approaches the model of philosophy, which was associated in the culture of the Hegelian era with intellectual intuition. The rejection of intuition and the describing of the content of self-consciousness in the process of its social activity create the danger of losing the unity, which is an essential feature of philosophical knowledge. Hegel finds a solution to this problem in building a composition of the work that is based on the consistent distinction and interaction of the subjects of «experience», which play a different role in moving towards the common purpose. As a result, the various socio-cultural content of «experience» in «recollection-inwardizing» takes the form of a «concept», that is accepted by Hegel as adequate to the nature of philosophical knowledge.

RUDN Journal of PhilosophyVol. 28(4)
Yelets State University named after Ivan Bunin (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Critical Theory and Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.