Freedom of Speech and Expression in the Digital Age: Philosophical Analysis and Social Security Challenges

Today’s information space poses new challenges to freedom of expression and freedom of speech associated with digital censorship, the spread of misinformation and algorithmic regulation of content. With society’s growing dependence on digital technologies, there is a need to rethink mechanisms for protecting freedom of expression, especially in the context of social security. The aim of this study is to analyse the philosophical foundations of freedom of expression in the digital age through the prism of T. Scanlon’s concept and to assess the role of media education as a tool to promote the formation of a critically thinking society. The materials are based on contemporary research in philosophy, media education and digital technologies. The methodological basis is philosophical analysis, interdisciplinary approach and case studies related to the regulation of freedom of expression in the digital environment. The results of the study show that traditional legal measures to regulate information space are not always effective and may contradict the principle of individual autonomy. In contrast, the development of media literacy allows citizens to consciously perceive information and build their own communication strategy, reducing dependence on institutional and technical control mechanisms. In accordance with the basic features of the philosophical approach, the authors consider freedom of speech as not only a legal category, but also a fundamental principle that ensures the intellectual autonomy of the individual. The specificity of the study lies in the integration of the philosophical discourse on freedom of expression with the current challenges of the digital environment, which allows us to propose new approaches to ensuring social security without compromising democratic values. The study substantiates the need for a balance between protecting the information space and preserving the autonomy of individuals, emphasising that an effective regulatory strategy should include not only legal measures, but also educational initiatives that promote critical thinking and conscious interaction with media.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RUDN Journal of Philosophy
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2025-29-2-381-397
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Freedom of Speech and Expression in the Digital Age: Philosophical Analysis and Social Security Challenges

T.Y. Lifanova, Sergey A. Lifanov, Alexey V. Verevkin
RUDN Journal of Philosophy
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

Freedom of Speech and Expression in the Digital Age: Philosophical Analysis and Social Security Challenges

T.Y. Lifanova, Sergey A. Lifanov, Alexey V. Verevkin
article en

Abstract

Today’s information space poses new challenges to freedom of expression and freedom of speech associated with digital censorship, the spread of misinformation and algorithmic regulation of content. With society’s growing dependence on digital technologies, there is a need to rethink mechanisms for protecting freedom of expression, especially in the context of social security. The aim of this study is to analyse the philosophical foundations of freedom of expression in the digital age through the prism of T. Scanlon’s concept and to assess the role of media education as a tool to promote the formation of a critically thinking society. The materials are based on contemporary research in philosophy, media education and digital technologies. The methodological basis is philosophical analysis, interdisciplinary approach and case studies related to the regulation of freedom of expression in the digital environment. The results of the study show that traditional legal measures to regulate information space are not always effective and may contradict the principle of individual autonomy. In contrast, the development of media literacy allows citizens to consciously perceive information and build their own communication strategy, reducing dependence on institutional and technical control mechanisms. In accordance with the basic features of the philosophical approach, the authors consider freedom of speech as not only a legal category, but also a fundamental principle that ensures the intellectual autonomy of the individual. The specificity of the study lies in the integration of the philosophical discourse on freedom of expression with the current challenges of the digital environment, which allows us to propose new approaches to ensuring social security without compromising democratic values. The study substantiates the need for a balance between protecting the information space and preserving the autonomy of individuals, emphasising that an effective regulatory strategy should include not only legal measures, but also educational initiatives that promote critical thinking and conscious interaction with media.

RUDN Journal of PhilosophyVol. 29(2)
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.