Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp’s Philosophy

This paper presents an interpretation of the connection between Natorp’s early and late philosophy. An analysis of two versions of Natorp’s deduction of categories shows the consistent development of Natorp’s thought. Each deduction expresses, in Natorp’s words, a direction of movement between the centre and the periphery. The early deduction moves from the periphery to the centre by means of the transcendental method. The critical investigation of the conditions of possibility of mathematical-physical science reveals the structure of thought itself. The late deduction is oriented in the opposite direction, from the centre to the periphery. Thought now develops freely and establishes the systematic character of philosophy. We argue that the two deductions complement each other in a single coherent position that accounts for the relationship between critique and system. Philosophical systematics is conceived as the necessary sequel and culmination of an inquiry, the first part of which is developed according to the transcendental method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RUDN Journal of Philosophy
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2025-29-1-105-118
Primary Topic
Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp’s Philosophy

Hernán Pringe
RUDN Journal of Philosophy
Cybernetics and Technology in Society
article

Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp’s Philosophy

Hernán Pringe
article en

Abstract

This paper presents an interpretation of the connection between Natorp’s early and late philosophy. An analysis of two versions of Natorp’s deduction of categories shows the consistent development of Natorp’s thought. Each deduction expresses, in Natorp’s words, a direction of movement between the centre and the periphery. The early deduction moves from the periphery to the centre by means of the transcendental method. The critical investigation of the conditions of possibility of mathematical-physical science reveals the structure of thought itself. The late deduction is oriented in the opposite direction, from the centre to the periphery. Thought now develops freely and establishes the systematic character of philosophy. We argue that the two deductions complement each other in a single coherent position that accounts for the relationship between critique and system. Philosophical systematics is conceived as the necessary sequel and culmination of an inquiry, the first part of which is developed according to the transcendental method.

RUDN Journal of PhilosophyVol. 29(1)
Institute of Astronomy and Space Physics (AR), Universidad Diego Portales (CL)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos Aires
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cybernetics and Technology in Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Critique and System: Early and Late Natorp’s Philosophy — Hernán Pringe · RUDN Journal of Philosophy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS