“What’s next? What’s next? What’s next?”: deconstructing fallacies in a culture that won’t slow down

In UK academia, the pursuit of excellence often comes at the cost of wellbeing. This article explores three pervasive conceptual fallacies – arrival, progress, and productivity – that shape the academic experience from undergraduate study to senior research roles. These fallacies contribute to a self-reinforcing cycle of stress that perpetuates risks of burnout and disillusionment, particularly among postdoctoral researchers and PhD students navigating short-term contracts and shifting expectations. Drawing on recent data from the University and College Union (UCU) and sector-wide wellbeing reports, this article highlights how institutional frameworks and cultures embed these fallacies into the fabric of academic life. Even so, change is possible. By rethinking how we celebrate milestones, embedding and promoting restorative pauses, and redefining success beyond metrics, institutions can foster a healthier, more inclusive academic culture. With practical strategies and a call for structural reform, this piece invites educators, administrators, and policymakers to challenge the status quo, and to build a sector where achievement and wellbeing are not mutually exclusive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Biochemist
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1042/bio_2025_146
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“What’s next? What’s next? What’s next?”: deconstructing fallacies in a culture that won’t slow down

Thomas Malcomson
The Biochemist
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
article

“What’s next? What’s next? What’s next?”: deconstructing fallacies in a culture that won’t slow down

Thomas Malcomson
article en

Abstract

In UK academia, the pursuit of excellence often comes at the cost of wellbeing. This article explores three pervasive conceptual fallacies – arrival, progress, and productivity – that shape the academic experience from undergraduate study to senior research roles. These fallacies contribute to a self-reinforcing cycle of stress that perpetuates risks of burnout and disillusionment, particularly among postdoctoral researchers and PhD students navigating short-term contracts and shifting expectations. Drawing on recent data from the University and College Union (UCU) and sector-wide wellbeing reports, this article highlights how institutional frameworks and cultures embed these fallacies into the fabric of academic life. Even so, change is possible. By rethinking how we celebrate milestones, embedding and promoting restorative pauses, and redefining success beyond metrics, institutions can foster a healthier, more inclusive academic culture. With practical strategies and a call for structural reform, this piece invites educators, administrators, and policymakers to challenge the status quo, and to build a sector where achievement and wellbeing are not mutually exclusive.

The BiochemistVol. 47(5)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), London School of Business and Management (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.