“What’s next? What’s next? What’s next?”: deconstructing fallacies in a culture that won’t slow down
In UK academia, the pursuit of excellence often comes at the cost of wellbeing. This article explores three pervasive conceptual fallacies – arrival, progress, and productivity – that shape the academic experience from undergraduate study to senior research roles. These fallacies contribute to a self-reinforcing cycle of stress that perpetuates risks of burnout and disillusionment, particularly among postdoctoral researchers and PhD students navigating short-term contracts and shifting expectations. Drawing on recent data from the University and College Union (UCU) and sector-wide wellbeing reports, this article highlights how institutional frameworks and cultures embed these fallacies into the fabric of academic life. Even so, change is possible. By rethinking how we celebrate milestones, embedding and promoting restorative pauses, and redefining success beyond metrics, institutions can foster a healthier, more inclusive academic culture. With practical strategies and a call for structural reform, this piece invites educators, administrators, and policymakers to challenge the status quo, and to build a sector where achievement and wellbeing are not mutually exclusive.
Authors
- Thomas Malcomson
Institutions
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- London School of Business and Management (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Biochemist
- Published
- 2025-10-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1042/bio_2025_146
- Primary Topic
- Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00