Coverage and metadata completeness and accuracy of African research publications in OpenAlex: A comparative analysis

Abstract Unlike traditional proprietary data sources such as Scopus and the Web of Science (WoS), OpenAlex emphasizes its comprehensiveness. This study analyzes OpenAlex’s coverage and metadata completeness and accuracy of African research publications. To achieve this, OpenAlex is compared with Scopus, WoS, and African Journals Online (AJOL). First, we examine the coverage of African research publications in OpenAlex relative to Scopus, WoS, and AJOL. Then, we assess and compare the availability and accuracy of metadata in OpenAlex, Scopus, and WoS. The findings indicate that OpenAlex offers the most extensive publication coverage. In terms of metadata, OpenAlex provides high coverage for publication and author information, though its coverage of affiliations, references, and funder information is comparatively lower. Metadata accuracy is similarly high for publication and author fields, while affiliation, reference, and funding information show higher rates of missing or incomplete data. Notably, the results demonstrate that both metadata availability and accuracy in OpenAlex improve significantly for publications also indexed in Scopus and WoS. These findings suggest that OpenAlex has the potential to replace proprietary data sources for certain types of analyses. However, for some metadata fields, there remains a trade-off between extensiveness and accuracy.