The MyCancerGene study: a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation randomized study comparing a patient-centered digital genetic health portal to usual care after receipt of cancer genetic testing

Genetic testing has become more complex with the transition from single gene testing to multi-gene panels and whole-exome sequencing. The adoption of more complex genetic testing and the promise of precision medicine has created a critical and urgent need for longitudinal clinical follow-up with patients who undergo cancer genetic testing given the residual uncertainty. There is an increasing need for multidisciplinary translational research that focuses on how to advance precision medicine discoveries into clinical practice and to capitalize on connectivity (e.g. digital health) interventions in ways that optimize cancer risk reducing behaviors in real-world clinical populations. The overall goal of this Hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation randomized study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the MyCancerGene intervention to improve longitudinal (short-term and long-term) understanding (e.g. knowledge) and reactions to (e.g. anxiety) clinical genetic testing compared to usual care. We hypothesize that access to MyCancerGene will be associated with short-term and post-disclosure increases in knowledge, decreases in distress, increases in communication with relatives and health care providers and performance of risk reducing health behaviors compared to usual care. Equally important, we hypothesize that our implementation process evaluation will inform recommendations for future adaptation and sustainability for other precision medicine applications. Given the increasing complexity of genetic testing applications (e.g. multi-gene testing, whole exome sequencing) and the need for post-disclosure follow-up, we expect this study to inform evidence-based practice guidelines for delivery of genetic medicine and potentially change the paradigm to include longitudinal care in precision medicine. To address the clinically significant gap in the delivery of genetic medicine, patient and provider stakeholder input have been used to develop a patient and provider informed centered genetic digital health portal to enhance patient understanding of, and affective and behavioral responses to genetic testing, particularly in the era of evolving evidence and risk information. This protocol was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04774445) in February 18, 2021.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14968-2
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The MyCancerGene study: a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation randomized study comparing a patient-centered digital genetic health portal to usual care after receipt of cancer genetic testing

Brian Lee Egleston, Kelsey Karpink, Sarah Brown, Briana McLeod et al.
BMC Cancer
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

The MyCancerGene study: a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation randomized study comparing a patient-centered digital genetic health portal to usual care after receipt of cancer genetic testing

Brian Lee Egleston, Kelsey Karpink, Sarah Brown, Briana McLeod, Jessica Ebrahimzadeh, Cara Cacioppo, Daniel Chavez‐Yenter, Arravinth Anantharajah, Angela R. Bradbury, Linda Fleisher, Susan M. Domchek, Kuang‐Yi Wen, Dana Falcone, Lynne I. Wagner, Dominique Fetzer, Jacqueline Cappadocia, Enida Selmani, Lauren Gutstein, Shelby Posen, Michelle Weinberg, Stephen Howe, Claire Langer, Beth McCarthy-Wood
article en

Abstract

Genetic testing has become more complex with the transition from single gene testing to multi-gene panels and whole-exome sequencing. The adoption of more complex genetic testing and the promise of precision medicine has created a critical and urgent need for longitudinal clinical follow-up with patients who undergo cancer genetic testing given the residual uncertainty. There is an increasing need for multidisciplinary translational research that focuses on how to advance precision medicine discoveries into clinical practice and to capitalize on connectivity (e.g. digital health) interventions in ways that optimize cancer risk reducing behaviors in real-world clinical populations. The overall goal of this Hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation randomized study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the MyCancerGene intervention to improve longitudinal (short-term and long-term) understanding (e.g. knowledge) and reactions to (e.g. anxiety) clinical genetic testing compared to usual care. We hypothesize that access to MyCancerGene will be associated with short-term and post-disclosure increases in knowledge, decreases in distress, increases in communication with relatives and health care providers and performance of risk reducing health behaviors compared to usual care. Equally important, we hypothesize that our implementation process evaluation will inform recommendations for future adaptation and sustainability for other precision medicine applications. Given the increasing complexity of genetic testing applications (e.g. multi-gene testing, whole exome sequencing) and the need for post-disclosure follow-up, we expect this study to inform evidence-based practice guidelines for delivery of genetic medicine and potentially change the paradigm to include longitudinal care in precision medicine. To address the clinically significant gap in the delivery of genetic medicine, patient and provider stakeholder input have been used to develop a patient and provider informed centered genetic digital health portal to enhance patient understanding of, and affective and behavioral responses to genetic testing, particularly in the era of evolving evidence and risk information. This protocol was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04774445) in February 18, 2021.

BMC CancerVol. 25(1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Fox Chase Cancer Center (US), Thomas Jefferson University (US), Institute of Medical Ethics (GB), University of Pennsylvania (US), Temple University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.