Iron‐Bearing Minerals as Potential Indicators of Paleo‐Methane Seepage Evolution

Abstract Methane (CH 4 ) release and consumption in marine cold seeps are key processes influencing seabed ecology, global climate reconstruction, and hydrate resource exploration. Anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM), the primary methane consumption mechanism, typically couples with microbial sulfate or metal reduction. Iron‐bearing minerals, including iron sulfides and iron oxides, have recently been recognized as key indicators of methane flux and metabolic pathways in cold seeps. However, their mechanistic roles in reconstructing paleo‐seep evolution under varying methane intensities remain unresolved. Here, we employed an integrated geochemical, mineralogical, and magnetic approach to analyze a seep core recording multistage methane expulsion events, revealing iron‐mineral responses to cold seep evolution. Our results show that iron‐bearing sulfides serve as key tracers of sulfidic environments driven by methane seepage. Their mineralogical attributes depend on both methane flux intensity and ambient iron availability. High methane flux combined with elevated reactive iron levels facilitates the coexistence of metastable iron sulfides (e.g., greigite) with euhedral pyrite. During cold seep evolution, declining methane fluxes and/or sustained sedimentation can trigger a transition from sulfidic to non‐sulfidic conditions in seep‐impacted zones. Microbially produced ferrous iron‐bearing oxides, such as magnetite [formed through Fe(III)‐driven AOM or methanogenesis], may indicate the evolution of cold seeps into anoxic, non‐sulfidic methane environments. These findings demonstrate linkages between iron‐mineral signatures and methane‐cycling processes, highlighting their potential as proxies for reconstructing seep evolution history.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jc022576
Primary Topic
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Iron‐Bearing Minerals as Potential Indicators of Paleo‐Methane Seepage Evolution

Meng Jin, Kai Liu, Taiheng Shi, Ganglan Zhang et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
article

Iron‐Bearing Minerals as Potential Indicators of Paleo‐Methane Seepage Evolution

Meng Jin, Kai Liu, Taiheng Shi, Ganglan Zhang, Yinan Deng, Pengcong Wang, Jie Ma, Jun Cao, Deng Liu, Fang Chen, Xiaoqiang Yang, Lixue Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Methane (CH 4 ) release and consumption in marine cold seeps are key processes influencing seabed ecology, global climate reconstruction, and hydrate resource exploration. Anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM), the primary methane consumption mechanism, typically couples with microbial sulfate or metal reduction. Iron‐bearing minerals, including iron sulfides and iron oxides, have recently been recognized as key indicators of methane flux and metabolic pathways in cold seeps. However, their mechanistic roles in reconstructing paleo‐seep evolution under varying methane intensities remain unresolved. Here, we employed an integrated geochemical, mineralogical, and magnetic approach to analyze a seep core recording multistage methane expulsion events, revealing iron‐mineral responses to cold seep evolution. Our results show that iron‐bearing sulfides serve as key tracers of sulfidic environments driven by methane seepage. Their mineralogical attributes depend on both methane flux intensity and ambient iron availability. High methane flux combined with elevated reactive iron levels facilitates the coexistence of metastable iron sulfides (e.g., greigite) with euhedral pyrite. During cold seep evolution, declining methane fluxes and/or sustained sedimentation can trigger a transition from sulfidic to non‐sulfidic conditions in seep‐impacted zones. Microbially produced ferrous iron‐bearing oxides, such as magnetite [formed through Fe(III)‐driven AOM or methanogenesis], may indicate the evolution of cold seeps into anoxic, non‐sulfidic methane environments. These findings demonstrate linkages between iron‐mineral signatures and methane‐cycling processes, highlighting their potential as proxies for reconstructing seep evolution history.

Journal of Geophysical Research OceansVol. 130(10)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), China Geological Survey (CN), China University of Geosciences (CN), Guangzhou Marine Geological Survey (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, China University of Geosciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.