Go hard or go home: Major removal of woody vegetation and sediment greatly enhances wetland plant and water beetle diversity recovery in a farmland pond landscape

Abstract Ponds are important habitats for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem service provisions in farmland settings. Agricultural intensification and cessation of traditional management have resulted in a substantial loss of open‐canopy farmland ponds across Europe, resulting in a decline of landscape‐scale biodiversity. To recover biodiversity in agricultural pondscapes, recent studies have advocated the restoration of overgrown, ‘late‐succession’ ponds via the removal of woody vegetation and/or sediment. However, few studies have documented real‐time pond and pondscape species responses to this kind of intervention. Crucially, evidence for how the intensity of intervention shapes biodiversity outcomes has been completely missing. We investigated short‐term (1–3 years) pond biodiversity responses to restoration at a typical, medium‐sized, predominantly arable farm in eastern England. Wetland plants and water beetles (Coleoptera) were surveyed in 11 restored ponds and four control ponds before and twice following restoration, involving three management prescriptions: (i) major woody vegetation removal only; (ii) major woody vegetation and minor sediment removal; and (iii) major woody vegetation and major sediment removal. Pond restoration involving major woody vegetation and major sediment removal was associated with the greatest uplift in α‐diversity for wetland plants. It was also most effective in restoring rare plant species, especially charophytes. Water beetle diversity also responded positively to major woody vegetation and sediment removal, with a significant uplift being observed. Overall, six red‐listed species returned to the studied pondscape following restoration interventions. Practical Implication . Our small‐scale, explorative study highlights the great potential value of implementing high intensity restoration interventions that combine major woody vegetation and sediment removal over lower intensity options, for maximising freshwater biodiversity and the conservation of rare species in agricultural landscapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.70139
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Go hard or go home: Major removal of woody vegetation and sediment greatly enhances wetland plant and water beetle diversity recovery in a farmland pond landscape

Helen M. Greaves, Ben Siggery, Carl D. Sayer, Jan C. Axmacher et al.
1 citations
Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
1.72
article

Go hard or go home: Major removal of woody vegetation and sediment greatly enhances wetland plant and water beetle diversity recovery in a farmland pond landscape

Helen M. Greaves, Ben Siggery, Carl D. Sayer, Jan C. Axmacher, Emily Alderton, Peter M. Robinson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Ponds are important habitats for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem service provisions in farmland settings. Agricultural intensification and cessation of traditional management have resulted in a substantial loss of open‐canopy farmland ponds across Europe, resulting in a decline of landscape‐scale biodiversity. To recover biodiversity in agricultural pondscapes, recent studies have advocated the restoration of overgrown, ‘late‐succession’ ponds via the removal of woody vegetation and/or sediment. However, few studies have documented real‐time pond and pondscape species responses to this kind of intervention. Crucially, evidence for how the intensity of intervention shapes biodiversity outcomes has been completely missing. We investigated short‐term (1–3 years) pond biodiversity responses to restoration at a typical, medium‐sized, predominantly arable farm in eastern England. Wetland plants and water beetles (Coleoptera) were surveyed in 11 restored ponds and four control ponds before and twice following restoration, involving three management prescriptions: (i) major woody vegetation removal only; (ii) major woody vegetation and minor sediment removal; and (iii) major woody vegetation and major sediment removal. Pond restoration involving major woody vegetation and major sediment removal was associated with the greatest uplift in α‐diversity for wetland plants. It was also most effective in restoring rare plant species, especially charophytes. Water beetle diversity also responded positively to major woody vegetation and sediment removal, with a significant uplift being observed. Overall, six red‐listed species returned to the studied pondscape following restoration interventions. Practical Implication . Our small‐scale, explorative study highlights the great potential value of implementing high intensity restoration interventions that combine major woody vegetation and sediment removal over lower intensity options, for maximising freshwater biodiversity and the conservation of rare species in agricultural landscapes.

Ecological Solutions and EvidenceVol. 6(4)
University of Surrey (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.