Clustering of Exposome and Lifestyle Data to Support Differential Expression Analysis of Circulating miRNAs in Multiple Sclerosis

Introduction:MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally and are influenced by various metabolic and environmental factors[1]. The functional exposome concept can be seen as a new strategy to study the effect of the environment on health and is increasingly studied to understand its role in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) development[2]: it describes the harmful biochemical and metabolic changes (internal exposome) that occur in our body due to the totality of different environmental exposures throughout the life course, ultimately leading to adverse health effects and premature deaths. Objective Variations in circulating miRNAs, as biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress, may identify subgroups of MS patients at risk. Cluster and study the characteristics of those groups and prospect different pattern of miRNAs, that may reflect distinct health status. Methods:A cohort of 139 people with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) was evaluated with detailed external exposome and lifestyle (air quality, urbanization, nutritional and occupational status) and internal exposome data (microbiome, oxidative stress and inflammation biomarkers). Differential expression levels of five circulating miRNAs (miR-30, miR-146, miR-330, miR-574, and miR-664) have been measured and normalized with respect to an endogenous control in all blood samples, for each miRNA; they were obtained from a reduced subset of participants (sample sizes ranging from 15 to 25 subjects per miRNA). Principal Component Analysis (PCA)[3] was used to reduce dimensionality of datasets and identify key patterns among the external exposome and lifestyle data. The first two principal components, which account for the most significant portion of variance, were selected based on parallel analysis of eigenvalues. Elbow Method was used to validate the optimal number of cluster and K-means clustering was then performed using these components. To assess the miRNA expression differences among cluster membership, we performed Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance followed by Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric tests. When appropriate, Dunn’s test with Bonferroni correction was used for post hoc comparisons. Results:PCA identified two meaningful components that captured the primary axes of variation in lifestyle and nutritional profiles (Figure 1A). PC1 was primarily characterized by negative loadings on EDSS while the PC2 by positive; regarding anthropometric variables (e.g., BMI, waist-related measures) both PCs are characterized by negative loadings. Whereas PC2 is correlated negatively with quality of life (MSQOL-29 both physical and mental) in contrast, PC1 showed a positive contribution of those variables. Based on the Elbow Method, three clusters were identified as optimal. K-means clustering was then applied to the first two PCA-derived components, resulting in the classification illustrated in Figure 1B. Three distinct clusters emerged: Cluster 1 (blue), positioned predominantly in the upper-left quadrant, Cluster 2 (yellow), mainly located on the right-hand side of the plot, and Cluster 3 (grey), concentrated in the lower-left area. These clusters differ along both PC1 and PC2 axes, suggesting heterogeneity in the underlying data structure. The clustering indicates that individuals were grouped based on shared patterns in anthropometric, clinical, and lifestyle variables. No statistically significant differences in expression were found for any of the five miRNAs across clusters. Levene’s tests confirmed the homogeneity of variances in all comparisons (p > 0.1) and, since miRNA levels were not normally distributed, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used. Kruskal–Wallis tests for miR-30, miR-146, miR-330, miR-574, and miR-664 all yielded non-significant p-values. Conclusions:PCA and clustering analysis should be considered as valuable tools to summarize complex lifestyle variables and explore their interrelationships in MS research. This exploratory analysis using unsupervised clustering of exposome-lifestyle data did not reveal significant associations with expression of selected circulating miRNAs in pwMS, but further comprehensive miRNA profiling on the full sample is warranted to validate the negative results obtained or change the proof of concept.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54103/2282-0930/29376
Primary Topic
MicroRNA in disease regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clustering of Exposome and Lifestyle Data to Support Differential Expression Analysis of Circulating miRNAs in Multiple Sclerosis

Clarissa Consolandi, Matteo Gastaldi, Alessia Lo Dico, Roberto Bergamaschi et al.
Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health
MicroRNA in disease regulation
article

Clustering of Exposome and Lifestyle Data to Support Differential Expression Analysis of Circulating miRNAs in Multiple Sclerosis

Clarissa Consolandi, Matteo Gastaldi, Alessia Lo Dico, Roberto Bergamaschi, Francesca Gallivanone, Roberta Pernetti, Eleonora Tavazzi, Rachele De Giuseppe, Elena Ballante, Bruno G. Galuzzi, Francesca Costabile, Enrico Oddone, Clarissa Gervasoni, Federica Loperfido, Maria Cristina Monti, Cristina Ceriani, Αliki Kalmpourtzidou, Gemine Vivone, Camilla Ceccarani, A. Scarabotto, Beatrice Maccarini, Hellas Cena, Cristina Montomoli, Antonio Mazza, Gloria Bertoli, Asia Filosa, Ghanya Al‐Naqeb, Tania Camboni, Donato Summa, Tony Christian Landi, Danilo Porro, Marco Severgnini, Camilla Torriani, Elena Colombo, Francesca Sellaro, Flaminia Tani, Chiara Pellizzer, Simona Gugiatti, Teresa Itri, Aurora Lanzotti, Vittoria Ercoli, Stefano De Cesari, Sofia Tagliaferri, Assefa Alemayohu Mulubirhan
article en

Abstract

Introduction:MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally and are influenced by various metabolic and environmental factors[1]. The functional exposome concept can be seen as a new strategy to study the effect of the environment on health and is increasingly studied to understand its role in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) development[2]: it describes the harmful biochemical and metabolic changes (internal exposome) that occur in our body due to the totality of different environmental exposures throughout the life course, ultimately leading to adverse health effects and premature deaths. Objective Variations in circulating miRNAs, as biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress, may identify subgroups of MS patients at risk. Cluster and study the characteristics of those groups and prospect different pattern of miRNAs, that may reflect distinct health status. Methods:A cohort of 139 people with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) was evaluated with detailed external exposome and lifestyle (air quality, urbanization, nutritional and occupational status) and internal exposome data (microbiome, oxidative stress and inflammation biomarkers). Differential expression levels of five circulating miRNAs (miR-30, miR-146, miR-330, miR-574, and miR-664) have been measured and normalized with respect to an endogenous control in all blood samples, for each miRNA; they were obtained from a reduced subset of participants (sample sizes ranging from 15 to 25 subjects per miRNA). Principal Component Analysis (PCA)[3] was used to reduce dimensionality of datasets and identify key patterns among the external exposome and lifestyle data. The first two principal components, which account for the most significant portion of variance, were selected based on parallel analysis of eigenvalues. Elbow Method was used to validate the optimal number of cluster and K-means clustering was then performed using these components. To assess the miRNA expression differences among cluster membership, we performed Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance followed by Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric tests. When appropriate, Dunn’s test with Bonferroni correction was used for post hoc comparisons. Results:PCA identified two meaningful components that captured the primary axes of variation in lifestyle and nutritional profiles (Figure 1A). PC1 was primarily characterized by negative loadings on EDSS while the PC2 by positive; regarding anthropometric variables (e.g., BMI, waist-related measures) both PCs are characterized by negative loadings. Whereas PC2 is correlated negatively with quality of life (MSQOL-29 both physical and mental) in contrast, PC1 showed a positive contribution of those variables. Based on the Elbow Method, three clusters were identified as optimal. K-means clustering was then applied to the first two PCA-derived components, resulting in the classification illustrated in Figure 1B. Three distinct clusters emerged: Cluster 1 (blue), positioned predominantly in the upper-left quadrant, Cluster 2 (yellow), mainly located on the right-hand side of the plot, and Cluster 3 (grey), concentrated in the lower-left area. These clusters differ along both PC1 and PC2 axes, suggesting heterogeneity in the underlying data structure. The clustering indicates that individuals were grouped based on shared patterns in anthropometric, clinical, and lifestyle variables. No statistically significant differences in expression were found for any of the five miRNAs across clusters. Levene’s tests confirmed the homogeneity of variances in all comparisons (p > 0.1) and, since miRNA levels were not normally distributed, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used. Kruskal–Wallis tests for miR-30, miR-146, miR-330, miR-574, and miR-664 all yielded non-significant p-values. Conclusions:PCA and clustering analysis should be considered as valuable tools to summarize complex lifestyle variables and explore their interrelationships in MS research. This exploratory analysis using unsupervised clustering of exposome-lifestyle data did not reveal significant associations with expression of selected circulating miRNAs in pwMS, but further comprehensive miRNA profiling on the full sample is warranted to validate the negative results obtained or change the proof of concept.

Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (US), University of Pavia (IT), Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (US), Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri (IT), Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IT), Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Nazionale Casimiro Mondino (IT), Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (IT), CNR-IMIOT – Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche - Istituto di Metodologie Integrate per l’Osservazione della Terra (IT), Institute of Biomedical Technologies (IT), Medical Technologies (Czechia) (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
MicroRNA in disease regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.