Under-Served in Qualitative Health Research: Overcoming Challenges to Recruiting People Who Frequently Use Urgent and Emergency Care Services

There is little understanding of challenges encountered when recruiting people who frequently use urgent and emergency care (UEC) services to qualitative research. This is despite considerable evidence that people who frequently use healthcare services are a heterogenous group, who are under-served in qualitative research with voices that are seldom heard. This is particularly problematic when their use of healthcare services is often associated with unmet complex health or social care issues, chronic health conditions, and factors such as lower socioeconomic status; also associated with lack of involvement in health research and challenges to health status. This paper provides insight into recruiting this under-served and seldom-heard population to qualitative research studies and suggests how identified challenges could be overcome in future research. Using Rolfe et al.’s Reflective Framework (2001), we examine processes and outcomes of five studies with differing methodological recruitment approaches to identify common challenges and facilitators of recruitment success. All studies aimed to recruit people who frequently used one or more UEC service. In comparing approaches, we identified two key stages of the research process that most contributed to difficulties and successes in recruitment of service users, and thus are deemed to be critical junctures: (1) Research Planning and Design, and (2) Research Delivery. The first contained themes around systems factors and study design factors , whilst the second included relational factors and personal factors . Recruitment was challenging across all studies due to unpredictable interplay of these four factors, indicating that there is no ‘one size fits all’ approach for future research. This reflects the heterogeneous nature of the group, and suggests that multiple, targeted approaches to recruitment need to be co-designed with multiple service users from the outset. We make further recommendations that may also be transferred to other under-served and seldom-heard populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251383463
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Under-Served in Qualitative Health Research: Overcoming Challenges to Recruiting People Who Frequently Use Urgent and Emergency Care Services

Gerlinde Pilkington, Jeffrey Scott, Steven Ariss, Ashrafunnesa Khanom et al.
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Under-Served in Qualitative Health Research: Overcoming Challenges to Recruiting People Who Frequently Use Urgent and Emergency Care Services

Gerlinde Pilkington, Jeffrey Scott, Steven Ariss, Ashrafunnesa Khanom, Alan Watkins, Tracy Collins, Sonia Saraiva, Celia Mason, Alison Porter, Lisa Moseley
article en

Abstract

There is little understanding of challenges encountered when recruiting people who frequently use urgent and emergency care (UEC) services to qualitative research. This is despite considerable evidence that people who frequently use healthcare services are a heterogenous group, who are under-served in qualitative research with voices that are seldom heard. This is particularly problematic when their use of healthcare services is often associated with unmet complex health or social care issues, chronic health conditions, and factors such as lower socioeconomic status; also associated with lack of involvement in health research and challenges to health status. This paper provides insight into recruiting this under-served and seldom-heard population to qualitative research studies and suggests how identified challenges could be overcome in future research. Using Rolfe et al.’s Reflective Framework (2001), we examine processes and outcomes of five studies with differing methodological recruitment approaches to identify common challenges and facilitators of recruitment success. All studies aimed to recruit people who frequently used one or more UEC service. In comparing approaches, we identified two key stages of the research process that most contributed to difficulties and successes in recruitment of service users, and thus are deemed to be critical junctures: (1) Research Planning and Design, and (2) Research Delivery. The first contained themes around systems factors and study design factors , whilst the second included relational factors and personal factors . Recruitment was challenging across all studies due to unpredictable interplay of these four factors, indicating that there is no ‘one size fits all’ approach for future research. This reflects the heterogeneous nature of the group, and suggests that multiple, targeted approaches to recruitment need to be co-designed with multiple service users from the outset. We make further recommendations that may also be transferred to other under-served and seldom-heard populations.

International Journal of Qualitative MethodsVol. 24
University of Leeds (GB), Northumbria University (GB), Swansea University (GB), Health & Life (Taiwan) (TW), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.