Comparing XRISM Cluster Velocity Dispersions with Predictions from Cosmological Simulations: Are Feedback Models Too Ejective?

Abstract The dynamics of the intracluster medium (ICM), the hot plasma that fills galaxy clusters, are shaped by gravity-driven cluster mergers and feedback from supermassive black holes (SMBHs) in the cluster cores. XRISM measurements of ICM velocities in several clusters offer insights into these processes. We compare XRISM measurements for nine galaxy clusters (Virgo, Perseus, Centaurus, Hydra-A, PKS 0745–19, A2029, Coma, A2319, and Ophiuchus) with predictions from three state-of-the-art cosmological simulation suites, TNG-Cluster, the Three Hundred Project GADGET-X, and GIZMO-SIMBA, that employ different models of feedback. In cool cores, XRISM reveals systematically lower velocity dispersions than the simulations predict, with all 10 measurements below the median simulated values by a factor of 1.5–1.7 on average and all falling within the bottom 10% of the predicted distributions. The observed kinetic-to-total pressure ratio is also lower, with a median value of 2.2%, compared to the predicted 5.0%–6.5% for the three simulations. Outside the cool cores and in non-cool-core (NCC) clusters, simulations show better agreement with XRISM measurements, except for the outskirts of the relaxed, cool-core cluster A2029, which exhibits an exceptionally low kinetic pressure support (<1%), with none of the simulated systems in either of the three suites reaching such low levels. The NCC Coma and A2319 exhibit dispersions at the lower end but within the simulated spread. Our comparison suggests that the three numerical models may overestimate the kinetic effects of SMBH feedback in cluster cores. Additional XRISM observations of NCC clusters will clarify if there is a systematic tension in the gravity-dominated regime as well.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ae100c
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing XRISM Cluster Velocity Dispersions with Predictions from Cosmological Simulations: Are Feedback Models Too Ejective?

Kotaro Fukushima, Lía Corrales, Chris Done, Katsuhiro Hayashi et al.
3 citations
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
3.46
article

Comparing XRISM Cluster Velocity Dispersions with Predictions from Cosmological Simulations: Are Feedback Models Too Ejective?

Kotaro Fukushima, Lía Corrales, Chris Done, Katsuhiro Hayashi, Ehud Behar, Aya Kubota, Kyoko Matsushita, Kouichi Hagino, M. Shidatsu, M. Audard, J. S. Kaastra, Paul P. Plucinsky, Kazuhiro Nakazawa, John A. ZuHone, Erin Kara, S. Eguchi, Nhut Truong, Hirokazu Odaka, Luigi Gallo, Hideki Uchiyama, Hirofumi Noda, Hisamitsu Awaki, Ayşegül Tümer, Y. Terada, Jacco Vink, K. Mukai, María Díaz Trigo, Aya Bamba, Eric D. Miller, Yoshiaki Kanemaru, J. M. Mïller, Ryuichi Fujimoto, Satoshi Yamada, Yutaka Fujita, Javier A. García, Andrew E. Szymkowiak, Kenji Hamaguchi, Takayuki Hayashi, Evan Scannapieco, T. R. Kallman, Anna Ogorzałek, Arnab Sarkar, A. Simionescu, Megan E. Eckart, S. Paltani, Edmund Hodges‐Kluck, Renata Cumbee, Hiroyuki Uchida, Hironori Matsumoto, A. E. Hornschemeier, Dylan Nelson, Mai Takeo, Daiki Ishi, Gregory V. Brown, Hiroya Yamaguchi, Adam Foster, Laura Brenneman, Masahiro Tsujimoto, Yoshitomo Maeda, Liyi Gu, Noriko Y. Yamasaki, D. McCammon, Toru Tamagawa, Shōgo Kobayashi, K. Yamaoka, Jan‐Uwe Ness, Annie Heinrich, Michael Loewenstein, Hiromasa Suzuki, Naomi Ota, M. Guainazzi, Kosuke Sato, Weiguang Cui, Takaaki Tanaka, Satoru Katsuda, Tsunefumi Mizuno, Randall K. Smith, Yoshihiro Ueda, M. Tashiro, M. Yamauchi, Ikuyuki Mitsuishi, Teruaki Enoto, Takeshi Go Tsuru, Isamu Hatsukade, Congyao Zhang, Hiroshi Murakami, Shutaro Ueda, Ken Ebisawa, Nobuhiro Okabe, Maurice A. Leutenegger, Takashi Okajima, F. S. Porter, D. Eckert, Maxim Markevitch, R. F. Mushotzky, Natalie Hell, Kumiko Nobukawa, Daniel R. Wik, Yuki Omiya, Ming Sun, Y. Fukazawa, Makoto Sawada, Ralf Ballhausen, Mihoko Yukita, B. R. McNamara, Brian J. Williams, Hannah McCall, Masayoshi Nobukawa, Misaki Mizumoto, Yoshitaka Ishisaki, Rozenn Boissay-Malaquin, François Mernier, K. Pottschmidt, Shunji Kitamoto, T. Yoneyama, Robert Petre, Toshiki Sato, E. Costantini, H. Takahashi, S. Yamada, Yuusuke Uchida, Yuichi Terashima, Yuto Ichinohe, A. Tanimoto, Caroline A. Kilbourne, Shoji Ogawa, Skylar Grayson, Nagomi Uchida, Koji Mori, Y. Tsuboi, Shin Watanabe, S. Ettori, Shinichiro Uno, Manabu Ishida, Kumi Ishikawa, Hiromi Seta, Hiroshi Nakajima, Richard L. Kelley, Hiroshi Tsunemi, Tadayasu Dotani, Akihiro Furuzawa, Yuichiro Ezoe, Keisuke Tamura, Tessei Yoshida, Takayoshi Kohmura, Keita Tanaka, Tahir Yaqoob
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The dynamics of the intracluster medium (ICM), the hot plasma that fills galaxy clusters, are shaped by gravity-driven cluster mergers and feedback from supermassive black holes (SMBHs) in the cluster cores. XRISM measurements of ICM velocities in several clusters offer insights into these processes. We compare XRISM measurements for nine galaxy clusters (Virgo, Perseus, Centaurus, Hydra-A, PKS 0745–19, A2029, Coma, A2319, and Ophiuchus) with predictions from three state-of-the-art cosmological simulation suites, TNG-Cluster, the Three Hundred Project GADGET-X, and GIZMO-SIMBA, that employ different models of feedback. In cool cores, XRISM reveals systematically lower velocity dispersions than the simulations predict, with all 10 measurements below the median simulated values by a factor of 1.5–1.7 on average and all falling within the bottom 10% of the predicted distributions. The observed kinetic-to-total pressure ratio is also lower, with a median value of 2.2%, compared to the predicted 5.0%–6.5% for the three simulations. Outside the cool cores and in non-cool-core (NCC) clusters, simulations show better agreement with XRISM measurements, except for the outskirts of the relaxed, cool-core cluster A2029, which exhibits an exceptionally low kinetic pressure support (<1%), with none of the simulated systems in either of the three suites reaching such low levels. The NCC Coma and A2319 exhibit dispersions at the lower end but within the simulated spread. Our comparison suggests that the three numerical models may overestimate the kinetic effects of SMBH feedback in cluster cores. Additional XRISM observations of NCC clusters will clarify if there is a systematic tension in the gravity-dominated regime as well.

The Astrophysical Journal LettersVol. 993(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
3.46
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.