Quantifying spectroscopic flux variations between <i>JWST</i> NIRISS and NIRSpec: slit losses in emission line measurements of <i>z</i> ∼ 1–3 galaxies

ABSTRACT We analyse James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) Near Infrared Imager and Slitless Spectrograph (NIRISS) and Near Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) spectroscopic observations in the Abell 2744 galaxy cluster field. From approximately 120 candidates, we identify 12 objects with at least two prominent emission lines among $\left[\mathrm{ O}\, {\small {II}}\right] \lambda 3727$, $\mathrm{H}\,\beta \, \lambda 4861$, $\left[\mathrm{ O}\, {\small {III}}\right] \lambda 4959$, $\left[\mathrm{ O}\, {\small {III}}\right] \lambda 5007$, and $\mathrm{H}\,\alpha \, \lambda 6563$ that are spectroscopically confirmed by both instruments. Our key findings reveal systematic differences between the two spectrographs based on source morphology and shutter aperture placement. Compact objects show comparable or higher integrated flux in NIRSpec relative to NIRISS (within 1$\sigma$ uncertainties), while extended sources consistently display higher flux in NIRISS measurements. This pattern reflects NIRSpec’s optimal coverage for compact objects while potentially undersampling extended sources. Quantitative analysis demonstrates that NIRSpec recovers at least 63 per cent of NIRISS-measured flux when the slit covers ${&amp;gt;}15~{{\ \rm per\, cent}}$ of the source or when $R_\mathrm{ e}&amp;lt; 1\,$kpc. For lower coverage or larger effective radii, the recovered flux varies from 24 per cent to 63 per cent. When studying the $\mathrm{H}\,\alpha \, \lambda 6563$/$\left[\mathrm{ O}\, {\small {III}}\right] \lambda 5007$ emission line ratio, we observe that measurements from these different spectrographs can vary by up to $\sim$0.3 dex, with significant implications for metallicity and star formation rate characterizations for individual galaxies. These results highlight the importance of considering instrumental effects when combining multi-instrument spectroscopic data and demonstrate that source morphology critically influences flux recovery between slit-based and slitless spectroscopic modes in JWST observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf1837
Primary Topic
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying spectroscopic flux variations between JWST NIRISS and NIRSpec: slit losses in emission line measurements of z ∼ 1–3 galaxies

Maruša Bradač, Benedetta Vulcani, L. Pentericci, Tommaso Treu et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
article

Quantifying spectroscopic flux variations between JWST NIRISS and NIRSpec: slit losses in emission line measurements of z ∼ 1–3 galaxies

Maruša Bradač, Benedetta Vulcani, L. Pentericci, Tommaso Treu, Themiya Nanayakkara, P. J. S. Watson, Nicolò Dalmasso, Xin Wang, Kristan Boyett, Michele Trenti, Sara Mascia, Tucker Jones
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We analyse James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) Near Infrared Imager and Slitless Spectrograph (NIRISS) and Near Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) spectroscopic observations in the Abell 2744 galaxy cluster field. From approximately 120 candidates, we identify 12 objects with at least two prominent emission lines among $\left[\mathrm{ O}\, {\small {II}}\right] \lambda 3727$, $\mathrm{H}\,\beta \, \lambda 4861$, $\left[\mathrm{ O}\, {\small {III}}\right] \lambda 4959$, $\left[\mathrm{ O}\, {\small {III}}\right] \lambda 5007$, and $\mathrm{H}\,\alpha \, \lambda 6563$ that are spectroscopically confirmed by both instruments. Our key findings reveal systematic differences between the two spectrographs based on source morphology and shutter aperture placement. Compact objects show comparable or higher integrated flux in NIRSpec relative to NIRISS (within 1$\sigma$ uncertainties), while extended sources consistently display higher flux in NIRISS measurements. This pattern reflects NIRSpec’s optimal coverage for compact objects while potentially undersampling extended sources. Quantitative analysis demonstrates that NIRSpec recovers at least 63 per cent of NIRISS-measured flux when the slit covers ${&amp;gt;}15~{{\ \rm per\, cent}}$ of the source or when $R_\mathrm{ e}&amp;lt; 1\,$kpc. For lower coverage or larger effective radii, the recovered flux varies from 24 per cent to 63 per cent. When studying the $\mathrm{H}\,\alpha \, \lambda 6563$/$\left[\mathrm{ O}\, {\small {III}}\right] \lambda 5007$ emission line ratio, we observe that measurements from these different spectrographs can vary by up to $\sim$0.3 dex, with significant implications for metallicity and star formation rate characterizations for individual galaxies. These results highlight the importance of considering instrumental effects when combining multi-instrument spectroscopic data and demonstrate that source morphology critically influences flux recovery between slit-based and slitless spectroscopic modes in JWST observations.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 544(2)
University of Ljubljana (SI), Institute of Science and Technology Austria (AT), University of California, Los Angeles (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN), Astronomical Observatory of Rome (IT), University of Oxford (GB), ASTRO-3D (AU), Astronomy and Space (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (AU), Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova (IT), National Astronomical Observatories (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Swinburne University of Technology (AU), University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.