Monopolists for Competition? Incumbent Action by Telecom Operators and Financial Exchanges 1980–1990

Achieving and maintaining a monopolist position is often assumed to be among the objectives of a firm. However, there are instances where it is better to operate in a competitive market than remain a monopolist. Monopolistic firms may, therefore, push for deregulation - at least on their terms. We introduce the concept of monopolists for competition to analyse two such companies, Swedish telecom operator Televerket and the Stockholm Stock Exchange (SSE). Thus, the paper contributes to the literature on incumbent action and corporate political activity (CPA) by state-owned/state-controlled companies, a field that has received little interest in business history research. We find that the personal political skills of the companies' managers played a crucial role in the deregulatory process, as institutional obstacles prevented them from using many standard CPA tools. Fear of being perceived as monopolistic also restricted them from leveraging their market positions when controlling the evolving market structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business History
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2025.2539273
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monopolists for Competition? Incumbent Action by Telecom Operators and Financial Exchanges 1980–1990

Erik Lakomaa, Rasmus Nykvist
1 citations
Business History
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
2.23
article

Monopolists for Competition? Incumbent Action by Telecom Operators and Financial Exchanges 1980–1990

Erik Lakomaa, Rasmus Nykvist
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Achieving and maintaining a monopolist position is often assumed to be among the objectives of a firm. However, there are instances where it is better to operate in a competitive market than remain a monopolist. Monopolistic firms may, therefore, push for deregulation - at least on their terms. We introduce the concept of monopolists for competition to analyse two such companies, Swedish telecom operator Televerket and the Stockholm Stock Exchange (SSE). Thus, the paper contributes to the literature on incumbent action and corporate political activity (CPA) by state-owned/state-controlled companies, a field that has received little interest in business history research. We find that the personal political skills of the companies' managers played a crucial role in the deregulatory process, as institutional obstacles prevented them from using many standard CPA tools. Fear of being perceived as monopolistic also restricted them from leveraging their market positions when controlling the evolving market structures.

Business History
Linköping University (SE), Stockholm School of Economics (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Monopolists for Competition? Incumbent Action by Telecom Operators and Financial Exchanges 1980–1990 — Erik Lakomaa, Rasmus Nykvist · Business History (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS