How the Cross-Faults Influence the Dynamic Rupture Process: Insights from the Littoral Fault Zone, China

ABSTRACT The Littoral fault zone (LFZ), located on the northern continental margin of the South China Sea, is a seismogenic structure controlling seismic hazard, having experienced multiple earthquakes with moment magnitudes of 7.5 along its eastern and western segments. However, despite sharing a similar tectonic environment, the central section of the LFZ at the Pearl River Estuary (PRE) is a seismic gap capable of large earthquakes. Therefore, the central section of LFZ (PRE) is considered to be a potential location for strong earthquakes. This fault segment is adjacent to the densely populated and economically developed Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay area (GBA). Despite this, research on the seismic rupture process in the PRE section of LFZ is still scarce. This study utilizes dynamic rupture modeling to simulate Mw 7.5–8.0 scenario earthquakes of LFZ in the PRE and two northwest-trending cross-faults, the Xijiang fault and Qi’ao Guishan fault. By varying background stress, friction, and nucleation location assumptions, we simulate an earthquake rupture scenario and the associated ground motions. The results indicate that the Xijiang fault is more susceptible to being dynamically triggered than the Qi’ao Guishan fault. Among the six nucleation locations tested, three promote rupture on the Xijiang fault, with rupture patterns and trigger times varying with location. Other locations tend to rupture only the main northeast-strike faults of the LFZ without activating the cross-faults. Notably, the northwest-trending cross-faults extend onto land, potentially exacerbating the seismic hazard and risk to the neighboring regions compared to a rupture of the LFZ alone. This study provides a solid and reliable scientific basis for evaluating the regional seismic hazard and disaster reduction efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120250085
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How the Cross-Faults Influence the Dynamic Rupture Process: Insights from the Littoral Fault Zone, China

Houyun Yu, Xuping Feng, Chunjing Wang, Duyuan Xu et al.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

How the Cross-Faults Influence the Dynamic Rupture Process: Insights from the Littoral Fault Zone, China

Houyun Yu, Xuping Feng, Chunjing Wang, Duyuan Xu, Wenqiang Zhang, Xiaofei Chen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Littoral fault zone (LFZ), located on the northern continental margin of the South China Sea, is a seismogenic structure controlling seismic hazard, having experienced multiple earthquakes with moment magnitudes of 7.5 along its eastern and western segments. However, despite sharing a similar tectonic environment, the central section of the LFZ at the Pearl River Estuary (PRE) is a seismic gap capable of large earthquakes. Therefore, the central section of LFZ (PRE) is considered to be a potential location for strong earthquakes. This fault segment is adjacent to the densely populated and economically developed Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay area (GBA). Despite this, research on the seismic rupture process in the PRE section of LFZ is still scarce. This study utilizes dynamic rupture modeling to simulate Mw 7.5–8.0 scenario earthquakes of LFZ in the PRE and two northwest-trending cross-faults, the Xijiang fault and Qi’ao Guishan fault. By varying background stress, friction, and nucleation location assumptions, we simulate an earthquake rupture scenario and the associated ground motions. The results indicate that the Xijiang fault is more susceptible to being dynamically triggered than the Qi’ao Guishan fault. Among the six nucleation locations tested, three promote rupture on the Xijiang fault, with rupture patterns and trigger times varying with location. Other locations tend to rupture only the main northeast-strike faults of the LFZ without activating the cross-faults. Notably, the northwest-trending cross-faults extend onto land, potentially exacerbating the seismic hazard and risk to the neighboring regions compared to a rupture of the LFZ alone. This study provides a solid and reliable scientific basis for evaluating the regional seismic hazard and disaster reduction efforts.

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaVol. 116(1)
Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), China Earthquake Administration (CN), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.