Advantages of Single-Position Surgery over Posterior Fusion for Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Diseases.

Single-position surgery with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs) is gaining attention for its reduced invasiveness. We developed SPAPS, a technique allowing two surgeons to perform anterior LLIF and posterior PPS insertion simultaneously in a single lateral decubitus position. This retrospective study compared SPAPS (SPAPS-LLIF, Group SL) and minimally invasive posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-PLIF/TLIF, Group PT) in patients treated between 2016 and 2019 with a two-year follow-up. Operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (LOS), JOABPEQ and VAS scores, segmental lordotic angle, lumbar lordotic angle, segmental Cobb's angle, PPS misplacement, PPS loosening, fusion status, and muscle cross-sectional areas were compared. Fifty-two patients were analyzed (Group SL: 25; Group PT: 27). SPAPS significantly reduced operative time (118.0 vs. 165.3 min, p <0.01) and estimated blood loss (8.6 vs. 164.1 mL, p<0.01). While clinical outcomes and hospital stay were comparable, Group SL had significantly lower PPS loosening (0% vs. 13%, p<0.01) and non-union rates (0% vs. 22.2%, p=0.02). Multifidus muscle atrophy was also less in Group SL (-14.3 vs. -121.5 mm2, p<0.01). SPAPS demonstrated advantages in reducing surgical invasiveness without compromising clinical efficacy, offering a promising alternative to conventional posterior fusion surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18926/amo/69437
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advantages of Single-Position Surgery over Posterior Fusion for Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Diseases.

Hisanori Ikuma, Tomohiko Hirose, Kazutoshi Otsuka, Keisuke Kawasaki
PubMed
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Advantages of Single-Position Surgery over Posterior Fusion for Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Diseases.

Hisanori Ikuma, Tomohiko Hirose, Kazutoshi Otsuka, Keisuke Kawasaki
article en

Abstract

Single-position surgery with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs) is gaining attention for its reduced invasiveness. We developed SPAPS, a technique allowing two surgeons to perform anterior LLIF and posterior PPS insertion simultaneously in a single lateral decubitus position. This retrospective study compared SPAPS (SPAPS-LLIF, Group SL) and minimally invasive posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-PLIF/TLIF, Group PT) in patients treated between 2016 and 2019 with a two-year follow-up. Operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (LOS), JOABPEQ and VAS scores, segmental lordotic angle, lumbar lordotic angle, segmental Cobb's angle, PPS misplacement, PPS loosening, fusion status, and muscle cross-sectional areas were compared. Fifty-two patients were analyzed (Group SL: 25; Group PT: 27). SPAPS significantly reduced operative time (118.0 vs. 165.3 min, p <0.01) and estimated blood loss (8.6 vs. 164.1 mL, p<0.01). While clinical outcomes and hospital stay were comparable, Group SL had significantly lower PPS loosening (0% vs. 13%, p<0.01) and non-union rates (0% vs. 22.2%, p=0.02). Multifidus muscle atrophy was also less in Group SL (-14.3 vs. -121.5 mm2, p<0.01). SPAPS demonstrated advantages in reducing surgical invasiveness without compromising clinical efficacy, offering a promising alternative to conventional posterior fusion surgery.

PubMedVol. 79(5)
Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.