Characteristics of a responsible community robot: Data from a Delphi study

This article presents data collected during a six-round Delphi study to explore and identify key characteristics that define a robot as a responsible community robot. A total of 20 panellists participated each with relevant technical, organising or contextual expertise. The study employed a case study of the development of a responsible community robot for a group of citizen scientists to support waterway monitoring, considering the product, process and paradigm of the robot. The panel contributed 170 ideas, which were combined into 111 voting statements and rated by participants from essential to unnecessary. The dataset presented in this article combines raw questionnaire data from the Delphi study and a record of the intermediate study analysis. The data provided in this article enables further investigation and comparative analyses into the characteristics of responsible community robots across a broader range of contexts. It offers a resource for roboticists and technologists, community groups and other stakeholders interested in the research, development and deployment of responsible community robots.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Data in Brief
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2025.112112
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characteristics of a responsible community robot: Data from a Delphi study

Hemma Philamore, Mark Goudswaard, Ella Maule
Data in Brief
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
article

Characteristics of a responsible community robot: Data from a Delphi study

Hemma Philamore, Mark Goudswaard, Ella Maule
article en

Abstract

This article presents data collected during a six-round Delphi study to explore and identify key characteristics that define a robot as a responsible community robot. A total of 20 panellists participated each with relevant technical, organising or contextual expertise. The study employed a case study of the development of a responsible community robot for a group of citizen scientists to support waterway monitoring, considering the product, process and paradigm of the robot. The panel contributed 170 ideas, which were combined into 111 voting statements and rated by participants from essential to unnecessary. The dataset presented in this article combines raw questionnaire data from the Delphi study and a record of the intermediate study analysis. The data provided in this article enables further investigation and comparative analyses into the characteristics of responsible community robots across a broader range of contexts. It offers a resource for roboticists and technologists, community groups and other stakeholders interested in the research, development and deployment of responsible community robots.

Data in BriefVol. 63
University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.