Accurate surrogate amplitudes with calibrated uncertainties

Neural networks for LHC physics have to be accurate, reliable, and controlled. Using neural surrogates for the prediction of loop amplitudes as a use case, we first show how activation functions are systematically tested with Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks. Then, we train neural surrogates to simultaneously predict the target amplitude and an uncertainty for the prediction. We disentangle systematic uncertainties, learned by a well-defined likelihood loss, from statistical uncertainties, which require the introduction of Bayesian neural networks or repulsive ensembles. We test the coverage of the learned uncertainties using pull distributions to quantify the calibration of cutting-edge neural surrogates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SciPost Physics Core
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21468/scipostphyscore.8.4.073
Citations
4
Primary Topic
GNSS positioning and interference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accurate surrogate amplitudes with calibrated uncertainties

Tilman Plehn, Ramon Winterhalder, Manuel Haußmann, Luigi Favaro et al.
4 citations
SciPost Physics Core
GNSS positioning and interference
19.97
article

Accurate surrogate amplitudes with calibrated uncertainties

Tilman Plehn, Ramon Winterhalder, Manuel Haußmann, Luigi Favaro, Nina Elmer, Henning Bahl
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Neural networks for LHC physics have to be accurate, reliable, and controlled. Using neural surrogates for the prediction of loop amplitudes as a use case, we first show how activation functions are systematically tested with Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks. Then, we train neural surrogates to simultaneously predict the target amplitude and an uncertainty for the prediction. We disentangle systematic uncertainties, learned by a well-defined likelihood loss, from statistical uncertainties, which require the introduction of Bayesian neural networks or repulsive ensembles. We test the coverage of the learned uncertainties using pull distributions to quantify the calibration of cutting-edge neural surrogates.

SciPost Physics CoreVol. 8(4)
University of Southern Denmark (DK), University of Milan (IT), Heidelberg University (DE), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Milano (IT), UCLouvain (BE)
Baden-Württemberg Stiftung, European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS, Israel Science Foundation, International Max Planck Research School for Advanced Methods in Process and Systems Engineering
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
GNSS positioning and interference
19.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Accurate surrogate amplitudes with calibrated uncertainties — Tilman Plehn, Ramon Winterhalder, et al. · SciPost Physics Core (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS