Navigating The Pandemic Online: How Social Media Coping Patterns Affect Mental Health

This study examined how different patterns of social media use during the COVID-19 pandemic affected mental health. We surveyed 479 adults aged 18 to 70 using representative sampling methods. Our analysis identified three groups of social media users: Comprehensive Users (35.1%), who used social media extensively for problem-solving, emotional support, and distraction; Social-Recreational Users (40.9%), who primarily sought emotional support and entertainment; and Minimal Users (24.0%), who used social media very little for coping. Results showed significant differences in mental health across user types. Social-Recreational Users had the best mental health outcomes, while Comprehensive Users reported lower well-being despite extensive engagement, suggesting that excessive information-seeking may increase anxiety and stress. Higher COVID-19 stress levels were associated with increased social media use for coping. Additionally, age influenced the relationship between social media patterns and mental health, with younger adults benefiting more from social and recreational use. These findings highlight the importance of considering how people use social media when assessing its psychological effects during crises. Practical recommendations include encouraging selective and moderate social media use focused on emotional support and entertainment, particularly for younger people, and developing targeted mental health interventions and platform features to enhance well-being during global crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251386172
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating The Pandemic Online: How Social Media Coping Patterns Affect Mental Health

Sezai Tunca, Ceren Çubukçu Çerasi, Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu
SAGE Open
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
article

Navigating The Pandemic Online: How Social Media Coping Patterns Affect Mental Health

Sezai Tunca, Ceren Çubukçu Çerasi, Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu
article en

Abstract

This study examined how different patterns of social media use during the COVID-19 pandemic affected mental health. We surveyed 479 adults aged 18 to 70 using representative sampling methods. Our analysis identified three groups of social media users: Comprehensive Users (35.1%), who used social media extensively for problem-solving, emotional support, and distraction; Social-Recreational Users (40.9%), who primarily sought emotional support and entertainment; and Minimal Users (24.0%), who used social media very little for coping. Results showed significant differences in mental health across user types. Social-Recreational Users had the best mental health outcomes, while Comprehensive Users reported lower well-being despite extensive engagement, suggesting that excessive information-seeking may increase anxiety and stress. Higher COVID-19 stress levels were associated with increased social media use for coping. Additionally, age influenced the relationship between social media patterns and mental health, with younger adults benefiting more from social and recreational use. These findings highlight the importance of considering how people use social media when assessing its psychological effects during crises. Practical recommendations include encouraging selective and moderate social media use focused on emotional support and entertainment, particularly for younger people, and developing targeted mental health interventions and platform features to enhance well-being during global crises.

SAGE OpenVol. 15(4)
Gebze Technical University (TR), Doğuş University (TR), Alanya University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.