Verb second in Estonian and the syntax-prosody relation
Abstract Estonian declarative main clauses display a relatively strict verb-second (V2) order, resembling Germanic V2. However, two prosody-conditioned exceptions distinguish Estonian from Germanic: verb-third occurs with weak proforms in the ‘EPP-position’ and with nuclear-stressed finite verbs. We claim that the derivation of Estonian V2 differs from Germanic. The Estonian left periphery resembles Finnish, a closely related but non-V2 language. In both languages, finite verbs move to the highest T-domain head and a phrasal category moves to the specifier of this head, the EPP-position. Estonian V2 with its exceptions results from “Weak Start,” a prosodic constraint blocking spell-out of the highest copy of the chain derived by movement to the EPP-position when another phrasal constituent occupies the C-domain.
Authors
- Heete Sahkai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4057-741X)
- Anne Tamm (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5804-0174)
- Anders Holmberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5499-3760)
Institutions
- Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
- Institute of the Estonian Language (EE)
- Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary (HU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Uralic Linguistics
- Published
- 2025-10-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00042.hol
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 10.42