Binding in Finnish and the language-cognition interface

Abstract Binding conditions are usually modelled as a mapping from syntactic structures into sets of coreference relations expressed and represented by narrow syntactic devices such as indices and/or formal operations such as Agree. Here we consider an alternative based on binding data from Finnish and English in which the mappings are generated dynamically during left-to-right comprehension of an arbitrary number of sentences (“conversations”) at the language-cognition interface. The model assumes that binding regulates semantic assignment management at the language-cognition interface by blanking out portions of the transient discourse available for coreference computations at the hearer’s end. The hypothesis is tested by using the computational generative grammar methodology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Uralic Linguistics
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/jul.00043.bra
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Binding in Finnish and the language-cognition interface

Pauli Brattico
Journal of Uralic Linguistics
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Binding in Finnish and the language-cognition interface

Pauli Brattico
article en

Abstract

Abstract Binding conditions are usually modelled as a mapping from syntactic structures into sets of coreference relations expressed and represented by narrow syntactic devices such as indices and/or formal operations such as Agree. Here we consider an alternative based on binding data from Finnish and English in which the mappings are generated dynamically during left-to-right comprehension of an arbitrary number of sentences (“conversations”) at the language-cognition interface. The model assumes that binding regulates semantic assignment management at the language-cognition interface by blanking out portions of the transient discourse available for coreference computations at the hearer’s end. The hypothesis is tested by using the computational generative grammar methodology.

Journal of Uralic LinguisticsVol. 4(2)
Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.