Second Attempt at America First: Donald Trump and the Survival of International Organizations

ABSTRACT The second Trump administration poses an existential challenge to many international organizations (IOs), putting them at risk of no longer being able to perform their core functions. Compared to the first term, the scope of America First is much wider and the speed much faster. Trump no longer sticks to IO rules and is structurally undermining the US domestic agencies that provide input for IOs. At the same time, the academic literature highlights the overwhelming resilience of IOs over the last two centuries, and the demand for IOs to address international problems remains high. The loss of US funding, membership, and input is real, but an equally important question is how IOs themselves and the other members cope with and counter this challenge. Several leaders of IOs have pro‐actively stepped up and are strategizing on how to protect their organizations. In light of the imminent budget pressures, many IOs will have to downsize and potentially merge with other international institutions. IOs may thus become less central to the conduct of international relations. Yet, unless the Trump administration, in improbably collective action with China and Russia, manages to overthrow the whole postwar international system, IOs will remain relevant actors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Policy
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70107
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Second Attempt at America First: Donald Trump and the Survival of International Organizations

Hylke Dijkstra
Global Policy
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Second Attempt at America First: Donald Trump and the Survival of International Organizations

Hylke Dijkstra
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The second Trump administration poses an existential challenge to many international organizations (IOs), putting them at risk of no longer being able to perform their core functions. Compared to the first term, the scope of America First is much wider and the speed much faster. Trump no longer sticks to IO rules and is structurally undermining the US domestic agencies that provide input for IOs. At the same time, the academic literature highlights the overwhelming resilience of IOs over the last two centuries, and the demand for IOs to address international problems remains high. The loss of US funding, membership, and input is real, but an equally important question is how IOs themselves and the other members cope with and counter this challenge. Several leaders of IOs have pro‐actively stepped up and are strategizing on how to protect their organizations. In light of the imminent budget pressures, many IOs will have to downsize and potentially merge with other international institutions. IOs may thus become less central to the conduct of international relations. Yet, unless the Trump administration, in improbably collective action with China and Russia, manages to overthrow the whole postwar international system, IOs will remain relevant actors.

Global PolicyVol. 17(1)
Maastricht University (NL)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.