How should overall survival be analysed in randomised clinical trials in cancer if participants receive subsequent treatment lines? A stakeholder consultation

This work demonstrates that all stakeholder groups are interested in how subsequent treatment lines may impact overall survival and provides evidence on what future methodological work in the area should consider. The next step of this work will investigate whether it is possible to estimate the overall survival treatment effect in a hypothetical scenario where participants who received second-line therapy all received the same second-line therapy. This will aim to complement the existing treatment policy approach and quantify the impact of subsequent treatments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trials
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09148-3
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How should overall survival be analysed in randomised clinical trials in cancer if participants receive subsequent treatment lines? A stakeholder consultation

Peter Wheatstone, Kara‐Louise Royle, David Allan Cairns, Ian R. White et al.
Trials
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

How should overall survival be analysed in randomised clinical trials in cancer if participants receive subsequent treatment lines? A stakeholder consultation

Peter Wheatstone, Kara‐Louise Royle, David Allan Cairns, Ian R. White, David Meads, Jennifer K. Visser‐Rogers
article en

Abstract

This work demonstrates that all stakeholder groups are interested in how subsequent treatment lines may impact overall survival and provides evidence on what future methodological work in the area should consider. The next step of this work will investigate whether it is possible to estimate the overall survival treatment effect in a hypothetical scenario where participants who received second-line therapy all received the same second-line therapy. This will aim to complement the existing treatment policy approach and quantify the impact of subsequent treatments.

TrialsVol. 26(1)
University of Leeds (GB), Coronado Unified School District (US), Leeds Trinity University (GB), MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL (GB), Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (GB), University College London (GB)
Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How should overall survival be analysed in randomised clinical trials in cancer if participants receive subsequent treatment lines? A stakeholder consultation — Peter Wheatstone, Kara‐Louise Royle, et al. · Trials (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS