Patient reported outcomes in pediatric physical therapy: a scoping review and evidence map

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be used as tools for understanding patients’ health perceptions. Gaining a comprehensive understanding of the landscape of PROs and PROMs within PPT, along with identifying potentially valuable (generic) PROs for the specific context and population, provides a valuable foundation for developing recommendations on PROM use in PPT. To provide a scoping review of measured PROs in studies describing PPT interventions. Additionally, to provide an overview of used PROMs in PPT. This review is conducted based on the PRISMA-ScR Checklist. A systematic search was conducted in Medline (2013–2023). Peer-reviewed studies for children aged 4–17 years with problems in physical functioning, were included when a described intervention was related to PPT or exercise therapy, and the studies reported PROs or used PROMs (proxy/self-reported). PROs were extracted verbatim, categorized and labelled based on the Alonso & Valderas model. A graphical overview was created to synthesize PROs measured per diagnosis. 172 studies were included. We identified 168 measured PROs which could be categorized into 40 unique PROs, measured with 158 PROMs. Most measured PROs fell in the ‘Functional Status – Activities and Participation’ and ‘Symptom Status’ classification of the Alonso and Valderas model. An excessive number of PROs and PROMs is used in PPT, which complicates standardization and implementation of PROMs. Harmonization of PRO(M)s in PPT is needed to address this problem. Therefore, a generic core set of PROs and PROMs should be developed for daily practice and research within PPT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00947-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient reported outcomes in pediatric physical therapy: a scoping review and evidence map

Raoul Engelbert, Selina Limmen, Marjolijn Ketelaar, Dorinde Korteling et al.
2 citations
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
2.94
article

Patient reported outcomes in pediatric physical therapy: a scoping review and evidence map

Raoul Engelbert, Selina Limmen, Marjolijn Ketelaar, Dorinde Korteling, Michiel A. J. Luijten, Hedy A. van Oers, Lotte Haverman, Joost G. Daams, Manon Bloemen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be used as tools for understanding patients’ health perceptions. Gaining a comprehensive understanding of the landscape of PROs and PROMs within PPT, along with identifying potentially valuable (generic) PROs for the specific context and population, provides a valuable foundation for developing recommendations on PROM use in PPT. To provide a scoping review of measured PROs in studies describing PPT interventions. Additionally, to provide an overview of used PROMs in PPT. This review is conducted based on the PRISMA-ScR Checklist. A systematic search was conducted in Medline (2013–2023). Peer-reviewed studies for children aged 4–17 years with problems in physical functioning, were included when a described intervention was related to PPT or exercise therapy, and the studies reported PROs or used PROMs (proxy/self-reported). PROs were extracted verbatim, categorized and labelled based on the Alonso & Valderas model. A graphical overview was created to synthesize PROs measured per diagnosis. 172 studies were included. We identified 168 measured PROs which could be categorized into 40 unique PROs, measured with 158 PROMs. Most measured PROs fell in the ‘Functional Status – Activities and Participation’ and ‘Symptom Status’ classification of the Alonso and Valderas model. An excessive number of PROs and PROMs is used in PPT, which complicates standardization and implementation of PROMs. Harmonization of PRO(M)s in PPT is needed to address this problem. Therefore, a generic core set of PROs and PROMs should be developed for daily practice and research within PPT.

Journal of Patient-Reported OutcomesVol. 9(1)
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Utrecht University (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Emma Kinderziekenhuis (NL), War Child (NL), GGD Amsterdam (NL), Public Health Service of Amsterdam (NL), Child Development Center (QA), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), De Hoogstraat Revalidatie (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Zorginstituut Nederland
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
2.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.