Using Longitudinal Qualitative Interviews to Advance Human Resource Management Scholarship: A Scoping Review

ABSTRACT This article reports a scoping study that identifies how longitudinal qualitative interviews (LQI) have been used as a data collection method in human resource management (HRM) research (2001–2023). Although growing in frequency, LQI usage remains rare. Studies documenting how different groups of employees experience or respond to external events, career transition points, or organization‐driven changes are most common. Researchers have taken advantage of LQIs' flexibility by incorporating emergent themes and extraneous events into their analysis, and by adding longitudinal perspectives to prior cross‐sectional studies. Phenomena that can benefit from LQI studies include HRM‐related changes that evolve unpredictably or impact groups of stakeholders differently, such as AI‐based hiring, diversity, equity and inclusion policies, and remote/virtual work. We also distil ‘good practice’ principles for LQI studies for recruiting, managing, and retaining research participants, maintaining interviewer–interviewee relationships, ensuring ethical practices, and reporting results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.70039
Primary Topic
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Longitudinal Qualitative Interviews to Advance Human Resource Management Scholarship: A Scoping Review

Anthony Fee
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
article

Using Longitudinal Qualitative Interviews to Advance Human Resource Management Scholarship: A Scoping Review

Anthony Fee
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article reports a scoping study that identifies how longitudinal qualitative interviews (LQI) have been used as a data collection method in human resource management (HRM) research (2001–2023). Although growing in frequency, LQI usage remains rare. Studies documenting how different groups of employees experience or respond to external events, career transition points, or organization‐driven changes are most common. Researchers have taken advantage of LQIs' flexibility by incorporating emergent themes and extraneous events into their analysis, and by adding longitudinal perspectives to prior cross‐sectional studies. Phenomena that can benefit from LQI studies include HRM‐related changes that evolve unpredictably or impact groups of stakeholders differently, such as AI‐based hiring, diversity, equity and inclusion policies, and remote/virtual work. We also distil ‘good practice’ principles for LQI studies for recruiting, managing, and retaining research participants, maintaining interviewer–interviewee relationships, ensuring ethical practices, and reporting results.

Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesVol. 63(4)
University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.