Clinical Evaluation of Digital PCR for Rapid Pathogen Detection in Suspected Bloodstream Infections

<b>Aims/Background</b> Bloodstream infection (BSI) is a life-threatening condition, and early, accurate pathogen identification is essential for improving patient outcomes. Conventional blood culture (BC) methods have notable limitations, including low sensitivity, prolonged turnaround time, and susceptibility to prior antibiotic exposure. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and clinical value of digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) in patients with suspected BSI. <b>Methods</b> This retrospective study included 294 patients with suspected BSI admitted to the Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, between January 2021 and April 2022. All patients underwent BC and dPCR testing. dPCR was performed using a multiplex bacterial nucleic acid detection kit targeting <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>, and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>. BC results served as the reference standard, and discordant findings were resolved using Sanger sequencing. Sensitivity, specificity, overall agreement, and Kappa coefficients were analysed. The diagnostic efficacy of dPCR for localised infections was assessed, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate clinical predictors of dPCR positivity. <b>Results</b> Compared with BC, dPCR demonstrated a significantly higher positivity rate (41.5% vs. 12.2%). Validated against BC plus Sanger sequencing, dPCR achieved near-perfect sensitivity (99.18%) and specificity (99.42%), with an overall agreement of 99.32% (Kappa = 0.99). dPCR identified substantially more true-positive cases missed by BC (86 additional true positives and only one false positive). These patients had pathogens identified in other tissue samples, supporting the value of dPCR in early detection of occult infections. Multivariate analysis revealed elevated procalcitonin (PCT) as an independent predictor of dPCR positivity. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for PCT predicting dPCR positivity yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.656 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.592-0.720, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with an optimal cut-off of 6.11 ng/mL. <b>Conclusion</b> dPCR demonstrates high sensitivity and accuracy for BSI diagnosis, allowing earlier detection of occult infections missed by conventional methods. Guided by clinical risk factors such as PCT, dPCR may refine diagnostic and treatment pathways for BSI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Hospital Medicine
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2025.0561
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Evaluation of Digital PCR for Rapid Pathogen Detection in Suspected Bloodstream Infections

Junyan Liu, Yunsong Yu, Yuning Wu, S X Weng et al.
British Journal of Hospital Medicine
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

Clinical Evaluation of Digital PCR for Rapid Pathogen Detection in Suspected Bloodstream Infections

Junyan Liu, Yunsong Yu, Yuning Wu, S X Weng, Yan Chen, Ling Lin, Ni Zhou
article en

Abstract

<b>Aims/Background</b> Bloodstream infection (BSI) is a life-threatening condition, and early, accurate pathogen identification is essential for improving patient outcomes. Conventional blood culture (BC) methods have notable limitations, including low sensitivity, prolonged turnaround time, and susceptibility to prior antibiotic exposure. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and clinical value of digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) in patients with suspected BSI. <b>Methods</b> This retrospective study included 294 patients with suspected BSI admitted to the Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, between January 2021 and April 2022. All patients underwent BC and dPCR testing. dPCR was performed using a multiplex bacterial nucleic acid detection kit targeting <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>, and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>. BC results served as the reference standard, and discordant findings were resolved using Sanger sequencing. Sensitivity, specificity, overall agreement, and Kappa coefficients were analysed. The diagnostic efficacy of dPCR for localised infections was assessed, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate clinical predictors of dPCR positivity. <b>Results</b> Compared with BC, dPCR demonstrated a significantly higher positivity rate (41.5% vs. 12.2%). Validated against BC plus Sanger sequencing, dPCR achieved near-perfect sensitivity (99.18%) and specificity (99.42%), with an overall agreement of 99.32% (Kappa = 0.99). dPCR identified substantially more true-positive cases missed by BC (86 additional true positives and only one false positive). These patients had pathogens identified in other tissue samples, supporting the value of dPCR in early detection of occult infections. Multivariate analysis revealed elevated procalcitonin (PCT) as an independent predictor of dPCR positivity. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for PCT predicting dPCR positivity yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.656 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.592-0.720, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with an optimal cut-off of 6.11 ng/mL. <b>Conclusion</b> dPCR demonstrates high sensitivity and accuracy for BSI diagnosis, allowing earlier detection of occult infections missed by conventional methods. Guided by clinical risk factors such as PCT, dPCR may refine diagnostic and treatment pathways for BSI.

British Journal of Hospital MedicineVol. 86(10)
Wenzhou Medical University (CN), Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.