Hybrid cognitive authority and algorithmic subjectivity: rethinking knowledge management in AI-driven communication

Purpose This paper aims to explore the transformative impact of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and human-computer interaction (HCI) on knowledge management in business, focusing on how AI-driven communication reshapes organizational practices. It examines the role of HCI in designing user-centric AI tools and introduces Hybrid Cognitive Authority (the co-construction of knowledge between human and AI agents) and Algorithmic Subjectivity (AI-generated communication simulating intent without cognition) to evaluate their effects on decision-making, knowledge flows and ethical governance in commercial settings. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-methods approach integrates interdisciplinary genealogical analysis, qualitative case studies and critical discourse analysis. The study traces the evolution of commercial communication from mid-20th-century pragmatics to AI-mediated paradigms, synthesizing insights from cognitive science, information systems and digital epistemology. Five case studies of AI and HCI applications in business (e.g. customer service, recruitment) and discourse analysis of AI-generated artifacts provide empirical evidence for assessing knowledge management outcomes. Findings Generative AI, supported by HCI, enhances knowledge management by improving efficiency and scalability, but raises challenges related to transparency, algorithmic bias and accountability. Empirical cases demonstrate how hybrid human-AI systems optimize knowledge processes while highlighting ethical risks, such as biased outputs. The proposed framework of Hybrid Cognitive Authority and Algorithmic Subjectivity necessitates governance models that balance AI automation with human oversight to maintain trust and interpretive agency. Originality/value Unlike prior studies that view AI as a passive tool, this research positions AI as an active knowledge co-constructor, advancing knowledge management scholarship through the novel concepts of Hybrid Cognitive Authority and Algorithmic Subjectivity. It bridges theory and practice by offering actionable strategies for businesses to leverage AI and HCI responsibly, contributing to economic efficiency, ethical governance and societal trust in AI-driven communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Knowledge Management
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-02-2025-0252
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid cognitive authority and algorithmic subjectivity: rethinking knowledge management in AI-driven communication

Cheng Xu, Yanqi Sun
4 citations
Journal of Knowledge Management
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
9.46
article

Hybrid cognitive authority and algorithmic subjectivity: rethinking knowledge management in AI-driven communication

Cheng Xu, Yanqi Sun
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to explore the transformative impact of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and human-computer interaction (HCI) on knowledge management in business, focusing on how AI-driven communication reshapes organizational practices. It examines the role of HCI in designing user-centric AI tools and introduces Hybrid Cognitive Authority (the co-construction of knowledge between human and AI agents) and Algorithmic Subjectivity (AI-generated communication simulating intent without cognition) to evaluate their effects on decision-making, knowledge flows and ethical governance in commercial settings. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-methods approach integrates interdisciplinary genealogical analysis, qualitative case studies and critical discourse analysis. The study traces the evolution of commercial communication from mid-20th-century pragmatics to AI-mediated paradigms, synthesizing insights from cognitive science, information systems and digital epistemology. Five case studies of AI and HCI applications in business (e.g. customer service, recruitment) and discourse analysis of AI-generated artifacts provide empirical evidence for assessing knowledge management outcomes. Findings Generative AI, supported by HCI, enhances knowledge management by improving efficiency and scalability, but raises challenges related to transparency, algorithmic bias and accountability. Empirical cases demonstrate how hybrid human-AI systems optimize knowledge processes while highlighting ethical risks, such as biased outputs. The proposed framework of Hybrid Cognitive Authority and Algorithmic Subjectivity necessitates governance models that balance AI automation with human oversight to maintain trust and interpretive agency. Originality/value Unlike prior studies that view AI as a passive tool, this research positions AI as an active knowledge co-constructor, advancing knowledge management scholarship through the novel concepts of Hybrid Cognitive Authority and Algorithmic Subjectivity. It bridges theory and practice by offering actionable strategies for businesses to leverage AI and HCI responsibly, contributing to economic efficiency, ethical governance and societal trust in AI-driven communication.

Journal of Knowledge Management
Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology (CN), Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
9.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.