Efficient at What? The Independence of Efficiency Measures in Public Transit

Much of the public management literature focuses on public organizational efficiency as a singular construct, predominantly emphasizing cost minimization. This view, we argue, conflicts with sustainable management principles. Public sector organizations should not be driven solely by financial efficiency but also balance this with the pursuit of service quality and environmental sustainability. Moreover, achieving efficiency in one aspect does not guarantee efficiency in others, making it crucial to evaluate these dimensions separately. To demonstrate this, we analyze US public transit agencies, assessing their financial, service, and environmental efficiencies. Using the Triple Bottom Line model and a five-year panel dataset, we apply stochastic frontier analysis and factor analysis to examine the interactions among these metrics. We find that these three aspects are distinct and do not necessarily correlate. This finding is pivotal, highlighting the importance of clearly distinguishing between financial, service, and environmental efficiencies in public management research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
State and Local Government Review
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x251377373
Primary Topic
Transportation Planning and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficient at What? The Independence of Efficiency Measures in Public Transit

Jason Coupet, Yuhao Ba
State and Local Government Review
Transportation Planning and Optimization
article

Efficient at What? The Independence of Efficiency Measures in Public Transit

Jason Coupet, Yuhao Ba
article en

Abstract

Much of the public management literature focuses on public organizational efficiency as a singular construct, predominantly emphasizing cost minimization. This view, we argue, conflicts with sustainable management principles. Public sector organizations should not be driven solely by financial efficiency but also balance this with the pursuit of service quality and environmental sustainability. Moreover, achieving efficiency in one aspect does not guarantee efficiency in others, making it crucial to evaluate these dimensions separately. To demonstrate this, we analyze US public transit agencies, assessing their financial, service, and environmental efficiencies. Using the Triple Bottom Line model and a five-year panel dataset, we apply stochastic frontier analysis and factor analysis to examine the interactions among these metrics. We find that these three aspects are distinct and do not necessarily correlate. This finding is pivotal, highlighting the importance of clearly distinguishing between financial, service, and environmental efficiencies in public management research and practice.

State and Local Government Review
National University of Singapore (SG), Georgia State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Transportation Planning and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Efficient at What? The Independence of Efficiency Measures in Public Transit — Jason Coupet, Yuhao Ba · State and Local Government Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS