Clinical value of clinician‐ordered pathologist‐reviewed peripheral blood smears in a teaching hospital

Abstract Peripheral blood smear (PBS) review is a test performed to evaluate a wide variety of hematologic and non‐hematologic disorders. Evaluation of a peripheral smear by an expert permits assessment of blood cell morphology on a broad level. We aimed to evaluate the concordance between clinician orders and pathologist‐reported findings and to assess the diagnostic, normal, and informative categories. This study was a cross‐sectional analysis. Five hundred patients over a 3‐month period were included. Data collection included patient age, gender, ward, along with the clinical reason for PBS and the pathologist reading of the PBS. In this study, we classified the pathology report results into diagnostic, normal, and informative categories. We then evaluated the concordance between the clinicians' orders and the pathology reports; if at least one finding in the PBS result was matched with a clinician order, it was considered as concordance between the order and the PBS result. The most common cause of PBS order was WBC abnormalities (81.0%), followed by RBC (50.4%) and platelet abnormalities (41.4%). Pathologist evaluation showed 67.2% WBC abnormalities, 53.2% RBC abnormalities, and 44.2% had platelet abnormalities. Diagnostic findings were present in 13% of cases, while 79% were informative and 8% normal PBSs. Concordance between clinician orders and pathologist reports was found in 68.2% of cases. This study highlights the essential yet selective role of PBS in modern hematology, particularly in diagnosing WBC abnormalities and hematologic malignancies. While PBS offers significant informative value, especially for non‐neoplastic conditions like anemia and thrombocytopenia, its diagnostic contribution may be more limited. The concordance (68.2%) emphasizes the need for clearer criteria and targeted use to optimize resource utilization. Implementing standardized guidelines and leveraging technological advancements could enhance the efficiency and diagnostic impact of PBS in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Precision Medical Sciences
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/prm2.70014
Primary Topic
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical value of clinician‐ordered pathologist‐reviewed peripheral blood smears in a teaching hospital

Sadegh Masjoodi, Hamid Zaferani Arani, Mohammad Hossein Anbardar, Najmeh Zolmajdi et al.
Precision Medical Sciences
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
article

Clinical value of clinician‐ordered pathologist‐reviewed peripheral blood smears in a teaching hospital

Sadegh Masjoodi, Hamid Zaferani Arani, Mohammad Hossein Anbardar, Najmeh Zolmajdi, Fatemeh Tashakori Bafghi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Peripheral blood smear (PBS) review is a test performed to evaluate a wide variety of hematologic and non‐hematologic disorders. Evaluation of a peripheral smear by an expert permits assessment of blood cell morphology on a broad level. We aimed to evaluate the concordance between clinician orders and pathologist‐reported findings and to assess the diagnostic, normal, and informative categories. This study was a cross‐sectional analysis. Five hundred patients over a 3‐month period were included. Data collection included patient age, gender, ward, along with the clinical reason for PBS and the pathologist reading of the PBS. In this study, we classified the pathology report results into diagnostic, normal, and informative categories. We then evaluated the concordance between the clinicians' orders and the pathology reports; if at least one finding in the PBS result was matched with a clinician order, it was considered as concordance between the order and the PBS result. The most common cause of PBS order was WBC abnormalities (81.0%), followed by RBC (50.4%) and platelet abnormalities (41.4%). Pathologist evaluation showed 67.2% WBC abnormalities, 53.2% RBC abnormalities, and 44.2% had platelet abnormalities. Diagnostic findings were present in 13% of cases, while 79% were informative and 8% normal PBSs. Concordance between clinician orders and pathologist reports was found in 68.2% of cases. This study highlights the essential yet selective role of PBS in modern hematology, particularly in diagnosing WBC abnormalities and hematologic malignancies. While PBS offers significant informative value, especially for non‐neoplastic conditions like anemia and thrombocytopenia, its diagnostic contribution may be more limited. The concordance (68.2%) emphasizes the need for clearer criteria and targeted use to optimize resource utilization. Implementing standardized guidelines and leveraging technological advancements could enhance the efficiency and diagnostic impact of PBS in clinical practice.

Precision Medical SciencesVol. 14(4)
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.