Demand Shocks From the Gas Turbine Fleet in Australia's National Electricity Market

ABSTRACT The long‐run task of Australian power system planners is to identify the structural adjustment pathway associated with retiring the National Electricity Market's (NEM) coal fleet. System planning models seek to do this at minimum cost subject to a reliability constraint. This involves the deployment of low‐cost intermittent wind and solar resources with a mix of dispatchable, flexible ‘firming’ assets. Coal's energy‐producing role is thus replaced by renewables, and firming duties by short‐duration batteries, intermediate duration pumped hydro and the last line of defence—gas turbines. As it turns out, the mix of firming assets is crucial. In this article, we examine 12 (anonymised) electricity market model forecasts in the post‐coal era and find all have a surprisingly heavy reliance on gas turbines during critical event winter days. Using a dynamic partial equilibrium model of the east Australian gas market, we test the severity of what appear to be demand shocks from an emergent gas turbine fleet. The episodic demand shocks present as intractable, particularly if batteries and pumped hydro plant are ‘underweight’ within the aggregate generating portfolio. Adequate time is available for policymakers to respond in an orderly manner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.70065
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Demand Shocks From the Gas Turbine Fleet in Australia's National Electricity Market

Paul Simshauser, Joel Gilmore
1 citations
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.36
article

Demand Shocks From the Gas Turbine Fleet in Australia's National Electricity Market

Paul Simshauser, Joel Gilmore
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The long‐run task of Australian power system planners is to identify the structural adjustment pathway associated with retiring the National Electricity Market's (NEM) coal fleet. System planning models seek to do this at minimum cost subject to a reliability constraint. This involves the deployment of low‐cost intermittent wind and solar resources with a mix of dispatchable, flexible ‘firming’ assets. Coal's energy‐producing role is thus replaced by renewables, and firming duties by short‐duration batteries, intermediate duration pumped hydro and the last line of defence—gas turbines. As it turns out, the mix of firming assets is crucial. In this article, we examine 12 (anonymised) electricity market model forecasts in the post‐coal era and find all have a surprisingly heavy reliance on gas turbines during critical event winter days. Using a dynamic partial equilibrium model of the east Australian gas market, we test the severity of what appear to be demand shocks from an emergent gas turbine fleet. The episodic demand shocks present as intractable, particularly if batteries and pumped hydro plant are ‘underweight’ within the aggregate generating portfolio. Adequate time is available for policymakers to respond in an orderly manner.

Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource EconomicsVol. 70(1)
Griffith University (AU), Powerlink Queensland (Australia) (AU), University of Cambridge (GB), UK Energy Research Centre (GB), IBM Research - Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.