Impact of surgical treatment of ovarian endometrioma on fertility

Introduction. Ovarian endometrioma is a common ma­ni­fes­ta­tion of endometriosis, and it is associated with infertility. Two main surgical treatments have been de­scribed: complete laparoscopic excision and conservative tech­niques. These methods are substantially different re­gar­ding their efficacy and the risk of afflicting the ovarian re­serve, therefore their impact on fertility requires a critical as­ses­sment. Objective. The aim of the study was to com­pare the effects of major surgical methods on fertility in wo­men diagnosed with ovarian endometrioma. Materials and method. A systematic literature review, from 2019 to 2024, was performed, using PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Coch­rane, and Google Scholar databases, using keywords such as “ovarian endometrioma”, “surgical treatment”, “fertility” and “ovarian reserve”. Thirty-eight original studies, twelve meta-analyses and seven review articles were in­clu­ded. The parameters evaluated were the recurrence rate, the anti-Müllerian hormone level and the spontaneous preg­nancy rate. Chi-square test and Cox proportional ha­zard analysis were the statistical tests applied. Results. The com­plete laparoscopic excision significantly reduced the re­cur­rence rates compared to drainage or cyst wall ablation (12% versus 33%; p<0.01). However, this procedure caused a more pronounced decrease of ovarian reserve, measured by anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), with a mean reduction of 35% compared to 12% after conservative methods (p<0.05). The spontaneous pregnancy rate after excision was approximately 50%, higher than the 27% rate observed with conservative techniques (p<0.05). Conclusions. The com­plete laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma pro­vi­ded a superior disease control and higher spontaneous preg­nancy rates compared to conservative methods. How­ever, the fertility benefit must be balanced against the risk of re­duced ovarian reserve. The choice of the surgical method should be individualized, considering age, cyst size and the re­pro­duc­tive desire.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ginecologia ro
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26416/gine.49.3.2025.11099
Primary Topic
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of surgical treatment of ovarian endometrioma on fertility

Capros Hristiana, C. Darii, Ion Bologan, Irina Burdeniuc et al.
Ginecologia ro
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
article

Impact of surgical treatment of ovarian endometrioma on fertility

Capros Hristiana, C. Darii, Ion Bologan, Irina Burdeniuc, Ion Burdeniuc
article en

Abstract

Introduction. Ovarian endometrioma is a common ma­ni­fes­ta­tion of endometriosis, and it is associated with infertility. Two main surgical treatments have been de­scribed: complete laparoscopic excision and conservative tech­niques. These methods are substantially different re­gar­ding their efficacy and the risk of afflicting the ovarian re­serve, therefore their impact on fertility requires a critical as­ses­sment. Objective. The aim of the study was to com­pare the effects of major surgical methods on fertility in wo­men diagnosed with ovarian endometrioma. Materials and method. A systematic literature review, from 2019 to 2024, was performed, using PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Coch­rane, and Google Scholar databases, using keywords such as “ovarian endometrioma”, “surgical treatment”, “fertility” and “ovarian reserve”. Thirty-eight original studies, twelve meta-analyses and seven review articles were in­clu­ded. The parameters evaluated were the recurrence rate, the anti-Müllerian hormone level and the spontaneous preg­nancy rate. Chi-square test and Cox proportional ha­zard analysis were the statistical tests applied. Results. The com­plete laparoscopic excision significantly reduced the re­cur­rence rates compared to drainage or cyst wall ablation (12% versus 33%; p<0.01). However, this procedure caused a more pronounced decrease of ovarian reserve, measured by anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), with a mean reduction of 35% compared to 12% after conservative methods (p<0.05). The spontaneous pregnancy rate after excision was approximately 50%, higher than the 27% rate observed with conservative techniques (p<0.05). Conclusions. The com­plete laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma pro­vi­ded a superior disease control and higher spontaneous preg­nancy rates compared to conservative methods. How­ever, the fertility benefit must be balanced against the risk of re­duced ovarian reserve. The choice of the surgical method should be individualized, considering age, cyst size and the re­pro­duc­tive desire.

Ginecologia roVol. 49(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.