Comparison of PID and Adaptive Algorithms in Diesel Engine Speed Control

This study experimentally compares classical PID and three adaptive control strategies (including a novel adaptive control strategy developed by the authors) for stabilizing the crankshaft speed of a diesel engine (ADCR Euro 4). The tests were performed on a dynamometer with alternator-induced step loads. All tests were performed at a constant engine crankshaft speed using National Instruments instrumentation and custom LabVIEW-based software for real-time monitoring. Metrics included response time (RT), overshoot (OV), and steady-state error (SSE), each based on ten repetitions with reported standard deviations. Results show that the competitive adaptive algorithm reduced RT by ~20%, OV by ~15%, and SSE by ~10% compared to PID. These results confirm that adaptive control, especially the competitive strategy, provides high precision and fast disturbance rejection, bridging the gap between simulation-based studies and industrial diesel engine applications. These results highlight the potential of adaptive control in applications such as air–fuel ratio control, turbocharger pressure control, knock detection, and fuel optimization.