Intelligent traffic light management using predictive and dynamic traffic flow analysis

Traffic congestion in urban areas is a major challenge that leads to real-time problems such as elevated pollution level, greater fuel consumption, higher chances of vehicle collisions and stressed drivers. Therefore, Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) are needed to improve the efficiency of transportation networks, for smoother and faster travel while reducing strain on existing infrastructure. Smart Traffic Light Systems (TLS) are a critical component of ITS, helping to achieve these objectives. Adaptive Traffic Light Systems (ATLS) employ an approach that dynamically adjusts signal timings based on real-time traffic demand. Compared to traditional TLS with fixed timing schemes, ATLS is capable of meeting the dynamic requirements of ITS. This paper proposes an Adaptive Traffic Light System that predicts traffic volume for the current hour and day using machine learning. It integrates this prediction with a pressure-based method that dynamically controls traffic light phases based on present traffic conditions. A simulation environment was developed using the Simulator of Urban Mobility (SUMO) to evaluate and validate the proposed approach at an isolated intersection with traffic demand and patterns varying by hour and day. To select the most suitable traffic prediction method, a comparative study was conducted among Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree, Gradient Boosting, and XGBoost algorithms. The proposed system was compared with recent methods with similar objectives across 12 different scenarios. Results showed an average reduction of 26.3% in average waiting time, 22.4% in average time loss, 19.4% in total time loss, 23.8% in average CO emission, and 17.4% in average CO2 emission.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13694-w
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intelligent traffic light management using predictive and dynamic traffic flow analysis

Anchit Bijalwan, Manoj Diwakar, Durgaprasad Gangodkar, Prabhishek Singh et al.
4 citations
Scientific Reports
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
4.03
article

Intelligent traffic light management using predictive and dynamic traffic flow analysis

Anchit Bijalwan, Manoj Diwakar, Durgaprasad Gangodkar, Prabhishek Singh, Kuldeep Nautiyal
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Traffic congestion in urban areas is a major challenge that leads to real-time problems such as elevated pollution level, greater fuel consumption, higher chances of vehicle collisions and stressed drivers. Therefore, Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) are needed to improve the efficiency of transportation networks, for smoother and faster travel while reducing strain on existing infrastructure. Smart Traffic Light Systems (TLS) are a critical component of ITS, helping to achieve these objectives. Adaptive Traffic Light Systems (ATLS) employ an approach that dynamically adjusts signal timings based on real-time traffic demand. Compared to traditional TLS with fixed timing schemes, ATLS is capable of meeting the dynamic requirements of ITS. This paper proposes an Adaptive Traffic Light System that predicts traffic volume for the current hour and day using machine learning. It integrates this prediction with a pressure-based method that dynamically controls traffic light phases based on present traffic conditions. A simulation environment was developed using the Simulator of Urban Mobility (SUMO) to evaluate and validate the proposed approach at an isolated intersection with traffic demand and patterns varying by hour and day. To select the most suitable traffic prediction method, a comparative study was conducted among Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree, Gradient Boosting, and XGBoost algorithms. The proposed system was compared with recent methods with similar objectives across 12 different scenarios. Results showed an average reduction of 26.3% in average waiting time, 22.4% in average time loss, 19.4% in total time loss, 23.8% in average CO emission, and 17.4% in average CO2 emission.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Bennett University (IN), Arba Minch University (ET), Graphic Era University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
4.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.