Enhancing Digital Libraries as Communication Tools: LLMs for Automated Subject Classification of Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Digital libraries are vital communication platforms that facilitate discoverability, collaboration, and strategic engagement among academics, administrators, funding agencies, and policymakers. Central to their effectiveness is accurate subject classification of Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs), which enables clear information sharing and supports scholarly communication. However, author-supplied categories are frequently inconsistent or incorrect, often requiring manual review and complicating search and reporting. This study examines how Large Language Models (LLMs) can automate ETD subject classification, comparing prompt-based and fine-tuned approaches using over 9,200 records from Virginia Tech. Both methods are evaluated against established machine learning baselines, such as Support Vector Machines and multinomial Naive Bayes. Results indicate LLMs perform competitivSely in applied fields, but show systematic biases in more abstract or interdisciplinary categories—highlighting both their promise and the need for thoughtful communication system design in digital repositories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3711670.3764654
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Digital Libraries as Communication Tools: LLMs for Automated Subject Classification of Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Hajra Klair
1 citations
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
2.48
article

Enhancing Digital Libraries as Communication Tools: LLMs for Automated Subject Classification of Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Hajra Klair
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Digital libraries are vital communication platforms that facilitate discoverability, collaboration, and strategic engagement among academics, administrators, funding agencies, and policymakers. Central to their effectiveness is accurate subject classification of Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs), which enables clear information sharing and supports scholarly communication. However, author-supplied categories are frequently inconsistent or incorrect, often requiring manual review and complicating search and reporting. This study examines how Large Language Models (LLMs) can automate ETD subject classification, comparing prompt-based and fine-tuned approaches using over 9,200 records from Virginia Tech. Both methods are evaluated against established machine learning baselines, such as Support Vector Machines and multinomial Naive Bayes. Results indicate LLMs perform competitivSely in applied fields, but show systematic biases in more abstract or interdisciplinary categories—highlighting both their promise and the need for thoughtful communication system design in digital repositories.

Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhancing Digital Libraries as Communication Tools: LLMs for Automated Subject Classification of Electronic Theses and Dissertations — Hajra Klair · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS