Situated statistical reasoning assessment for postgraduate health sciences students: Design and validation

Abstract Situated statistical reasoning is fundamental to health education and research. However, it remains underexplored in the Latin American context, resulting in a scarcity of quantitative evidence to support its theoretical dimensions. This article focuses on the design and validation of a measurement instrument for situated statistical reasoning among postgraduate students. Utilizing theoretical frameworks for situated cognition and adhering to standards for educational and psychological assessments, a 27-item multiple-choice test was developed, comprising adapted and newly created items based on validated instruments. In a field test conducted during the 2022-23 academic year, 165 postgraduate students from the health sciences at a Colombian public university participated in the assessment. The results presented include descriptive statistics of the sample and the psychometric properties of the measurement tool, specifically its reliability and validity. The instrument demonstrated high reliability, with an overall Cronbach’s alpha and omega coefficient of 0.82 and 0.87, respectively. This research defines situated statistical reasoning as it applies to postgraduate students in the health sciences and provides a validated assessment for this construct. The research enriches the fields of mathematics and statistics education by providing empirical evidence on the statistical processes integral to the situated statistical reasoning of health sciences students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ZDM
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01753-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistics Education and Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Situated statistical reasoning assessment for postgraduate health sciences students: Design and validation

Jaime Andrés Gaviria-Bedoya, Difariney González-Gómez, Jhony Alexánder Villa-Ochoa
1 citations
ZDM
Statistics Education and Methodologies
2.63
article

Situated statistical reasoning assessment for postgraduate health sciences students: Design and validation

Jaime Andrés Gaviria-Bedoya, Difariney González-Gómez, Jhony Alexánder Villa-Ochoa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Situated statistical reasoning is fundamental to health education and research. However, it remains underexplored in the Latin American context, resulting in a scarcity of quantitative evidence to support its theoretical dimensions. This article focuses on the design and validation of a measurement instrument for situated statistical reasoning among postgraduate students. Utilizing theoretical frameworks for situated cognition and adhering to standards for educational and psychological assessments, a 27-item multiple-choice test was developed, comprising adapted and newly created items based on validated instruments. In a field test conducted during the 2022-23 academic year, 165 postgraduate students from the health sciences at a Colombian public university participated in the assessment. The results presented include descriptive statistics of the sample and the psychometric properties of the measurement tool, specifically its reliability and validity. The instrument demonstrated high reliability, with an overall Cronbach’s alpha and omega coefficient of 0.82 and 0.87, respectively. This research defines situated statistical reasoning as it applies to postgraduate students in the health sciences and provides a validated assessment for this construct. The research enriches the fields of mathematics and statistics education by providing empirical evidence on the statistical processes integral to the situated statistical reasoning of health sciences students.

ZDMVol. 57(7)
Universidad de Antioquia (CO)
Universidad de Antioquia
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Statistics Education and Methodologies
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.