Socioeconomic deprivation: barriers to guideline implementation for cardiovascular disease

The implementation of guideline-recommended care is associated with improved clinical outcomes for patients with cardiovascular disease. It is well documented that people living in low socioeconomic position have a high burden of cardiovascular disease and higher mortality rates. In this state-of-the-art review, the association of socioeconomic deprivation and guideline implementation is outlined, showing that across a range of settings, countries and clinical scenarios people with low socioeconomic position are further disadvantaged by sub-optimal provision of guideline recommended care. Reducing cardiovascular health inequality and improving population education should be priorities for governments. Greater attention to the provision of guideline-indicated care is recommended by tackling modifiable barriers to care. Broadly, the prioritization of use of advocacy, workforce, broader policy responses, data, randomized clinical trial re-design, quality indicators, and risk scores are recommended to reduce health inequalities for those who live in socioeconomic deprivation. A renewed focus on the provision of high-quality guideline-recommended cardiovascular care has the potential to reduce healthcare inequalities as well as improve clinical outcomes amongst our most socioeconomically deprived populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf735
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socioeconomic deprivation: barriers to guideline implementation for cardiovascular disease

Chris Wilkinson, Ramesh Nadarajah, Rajesh Vedanthan, Blake Thomson et al.
3 citations
European Heart Journal
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
8.45
article

Socioeconomic deprivation: barriers to guideline implementation for cardiovascular disease

Chris Wilkinson, Ramesh Nadarajah, Rajesh Vedanthan, Blake Thomson, Chris P Gale, Eva Prescott, Antônio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The implementation of guideline-recommended care is associated with improved clinical outcomes for patients with cardiovascular disease. It is well documented that people living in low socioeconomic position have a high burden of cardiovascular disease and higher mortality rates. In this state-of-the-art review, the association of socioeconomic deprivation and guideline implementation is outlined, showing that across a range of settings, countries and clinical scenarios people with low socioeconomic position are further disadvantaged by sub-optimal provision of guideline recommended care. Reducing cardiovascular health inequality and improving population education should be priorities for governments. Greater attention to the provision of guideline-indicated care is recommended by tackling modifiable barriers to care. Broadly, the prioritization of use of advocacy, workforce, broader policy responses, data, randomized clinical trial re-design, quality indicators, and risk scores are recommended to reduce health inequalities for those who live in socioeconomic deprivation. A renewed focus on the provision of high-quality guideline-recommended cardiovascular care has the potential to reduce healthcare inequalities as well as improve clinical outcomes amongst our most socioeconomically deprived populations.

European Heart JournalVol. 47(3)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), University of Leeds (GB), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Frederiksberg Hospital (DK), James Cook University Hospital (GB), South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), University of York (GB), New York University (US), Hull York Medical School (GB), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
8.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.