Construction Mechanisms and Management Strategies for Win‐Win Ecosystem From a Multi‐Scale Perspective in the Wujiang River Basin

ABSTRACT Multi‐scale synergy and enhancement of ecosystem services (ESs) is one of the key challenges for regional sustainable development. To address the limitations of existing single‐scale management strategies, we innovatively construct a multi‐scale analytical framework. Taking the Wujiang River Basin (WJRB) in Guizhou Province, China, as an empirical case, the InVEST model is employed to quantify ESs and integrate spatial econometric analysis with land use decoupling techniques, and we systematically reveal the formation mechanisms of multi‐scale win‐win patterns. The results indicate: (1) Ecosystem win‐win areas exhibit scale‐stable spatial distribution patterns. (2) Forestland and cropland synergistically form the foundational components of win‐win systems, but they exhibit a pronounced trade‐off relationship and scale‐dependent effects. As the analytical scale expands, the proportion of forestland shows a marginal decrease (from 85% to 74%), while cropland exhibits a marginal increase (from 12% to 23%). (3) Achieving multi‐scale win‐win synergy requires the establishment of a scale‐adapted governance system of “core conservation zones – flexible regulation zones”. Small‐scale units should designate core protected areas (forest coverage of 78.42% ± 4.14%) with strict ecological redline management, while large‐scale units can implement flexible regulation zones allowing moderate cropland expansion (cropland coverage of 19.62% ± 4.10%) alongside quality‐oriented forest landscape optimization. Concurrently, differentiated resource planning strategies and ecological compensation mechanisms are essential to mitigate conflicts of interest across scales. This study proposes a flexible regulation management model grounded in nature‐based solutions, establishing a quantifiable decision‐making framework for multi‐scale governance of ecosystems in karst regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Degradation and Development
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70182
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Construction Mechanisms and Management Strategies for Win‐Win Ecosystem From a Multi‐Scale Perspective in the Wujiang River Basin

Jiayi Wu, Zhengfeng An, Xiuxiang Meng, Nan Zhang et al.
1 citations
Land Degradation and Development
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
article

Construction Mechanisms and Management Strategies for Win‐Win Ecosystem From a Multi‐Scale Perspective in the Wujiang River Basin

Jiayi Wu, Zhengfeng An, Xiuxiang Meng, Nan Zhang, Yaxin Peng, Jinjin Wang, Junsheng Li, Xiaoping Lü, Yan Sheng, Junyi Yang, Shuhang He
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Multi‐scale synergy and enhancement of ecosystem services (ESs) is one of the key challenges for regional sustainable development. To address the limitations of existing single‐scale management strategies, we innovatively construct a multi‐scale analytical framework. Taking the Wujiang River Basin (WJRB) in Guizhou Province, China, as an empirical case, the InVEST model is employed to quantify ESs and integrate spatial econometric analysis with land use decoupling techniques, and we systematically reveal the formation mechanisms of multi‐scale win‐win patterns. The results indicate: (1) Ecosystem win‐win areas exhibit scale‐stable spatial distribution patterns. (2) Forestland and cropland synergistically form the foundational components of win‐win systems, but they exhibit a pronounced trade‐off relationship and scale‐dependent effects. As the analytical scale expands, the proportion of forestland shows a marginal decrease (from 85% to 74%), while cropland exhibits a marginal increase (from 12% to 23%). (3) Achieving multi‐scale win‐win synergy requires the establishment of a scale‐adapted governance system of “core conservation zones – flexible regulation zones”. Small‐scale units should designate core protected areas (forest coverage of 78.42% ± 4.14%) with strict ecological redline management, while large‐scale units can implement flexible regulation zones allowing moderate cropland expansion (cropland coverage of 19.62% ± 4.10%) alongside quality‐oriented forest landscape optimization. Concurrently, differentiated resource planning strategies and ecological compensation mechanisms are essential to mitigate conflicts of interest across scales. This study proposes a flexible regulation management model grounded in nature‐based solutions, establishing a quantifiable decision‐making framework for multi‐scale governance of ecosystems in karst regions.

Land Degradation and DevelopmentVol. 37(4)
University of Macau (MO), China Geological Survey (CN), Xichang University (CN), Renmin University of China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.