Automated Coding of Communications in Collaborative Problem‐Solving Tasks Using ChatGPT

Abstract Collaborative problem solving is widely recognized as a critical 21st‐century skill. Assessing collaborative problem solving depends on coding the communication data using a construct‐relevant framework, and this process has long been a major bottleneck to scaling up such assessments. Based on five datasets and two coding frameworks, we demonstrate that ChatGPT can code communication data to a satisfactory level, though performance varies across ChatGPT models and depends on the coding framework and task characteristics. Interestingly, newer reasoning‐focused models, such as GPT‐o1‐mini and GPT‐o3‐mini, do not necessarily yield better coding results. Additionally, we show that refining prompts based on feedback from miscoded cases can improve coding accuracy in some instances, though the effectiveness of this approach is not consistent across all tasks. These findings offer practical guidance for researchers and practitioners in developing scalable, efficient methods to analyze communication data in support of 21st‐century skill assessment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Educational Measurement
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.70014
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated Coding of Communications in Collaborative Problem‐Solving Tasks Using ChatGPT

Jiangang Hao, Michael Flor, Patrick C. Kyllonen, Emily Kerzabi et al.
Journal of Educational Measurement
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
article

Automated Coding of Communications in Collaborative Problem‐Solving Tasks Using ChatGPT

Jiangang Hao, Michael Flor, Patrick C. Kyllonen, Emily Kerzabi, Lei Liu, Wenju Cui
article en

Abstract

Abstract Collaborative problem solving is widely recognized as a critical 21st‐century skill. Assessing collaborative problem solving depends on coding the communication data using a construct‐relevant framework, and this process has long been a major bottleneck to scaling up such assessments. Based on five datasets and two coding frameworks, we demonstrate that ChatGPT can code communication data to a satisfactory level, though performance varies across ChatGPT models and depends on the coding framework and task characteristics. Interestingly, newer reasoning‐focused models, such as GPT‐o1‐mini and GPT‐o3‐mini, do not necessarily yield better coding results. Additionally, we show that refining prompts based on feedback from miscoded cases can improve coding accuracy in some instances, though the effectiveness of this approach is not consistent across all tasks. These findings offer practical guidance for researchers and practitioners in developing scalable, efficient methods to analyze communication data in support of 21st‐century skill assessment.

Journal of Educational MeasurementVol. 62(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Automated Coding of Communications in Collaborative Problem‐Solving Tasks Using ChatGPT — Jiangang Hao, Michael Flor, et al. · Journal of Educational Measurement (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS