Treatment Strategies for Isolated LC-1 Pelvic Injuries: A Comparative Cohort Study of Percutaneous Posterior-Only vs. Combined Anterior–Posterior Fixation

<b>Background:</b> The management of lateral compression type 1 (LC-1) pelvic fractures remains controversial. Posterior fixation alone has traditionally been practiced without clearly defined indications for supplementary anterior stabilization. Direct comparative evidence between posterior-only and combined anterior-posterior fixation remains scarce. This study evaluated whether institutional criteria reliably identify patients who benefit from additional percutaneous anterior fixation. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a level I trauma center and included adults with LC-1 fractures treated exclusively by percutaneous fixation. Combined anterior-posterior fixation was performed when predominant anterior pain and radiographic compromise indicated instability. Primary outcomes were pain trajectory (Numeric Rating Scale), inpatient opioid use, physiotherapy clearance, and ward mobility. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-seven patients were analyzed (combined = 14; posterior-only = 23). Preoperative pain was higher in the combined group (median 7 vs. 6; median difference 1 [95% CI 0 to 2]; <i>p</i> = 0.0036). Postoperatively, pain scores were lower in the combined group at 1-6 weeks (median difference -1 [95% CI -2 to 0]; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Opioid consumption was reduced (193 mg vs. 312 mg; median difference -200 mg [95% CI -280 to -120]; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and physiotherapy clearance occurred earlier (4 vs. 7 days; median difference -3 [95% CI -5 to -1]; <i>p</i> = 0.020). <b>Conclusion:</b> Our current indications to perform combined fixation were associated with favorable early outcomes in pain control and physiotherapy clearance among patients with LC-1 fractures showing anterior compromise. These results support a selective combined approach, though interpretation must remain cautious given the small retrospective cohort. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and refine patient selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217507
Primary Topic
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment Strategies for Isolated LC-1 Pelvic Injuries: A Comparative Cohort Study of Percutaneous Posterior-Only vs. Combined Anterior–Posterior Fixation

Frank Hildebrand, Eftychios Bolierakis, Hatem Alabdulrahman, Till Berk et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
article

Treatment Strategies for Isolated LC-1 Pelvic Injuries: A Comparative Cohort Study of Percutaneous Posterior-Only vs. Combined Anterior–Posterior Fixation

Frank Hildebrand, Eftychios Bolierakis, Hatem Alabdulrahman, Till Berk, Mohammed Abdelrahman
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> The management of lateral compression type 1 (LC-1) pelvic fractures remains controversial. Posterior fixation alone has traditionally been practiced without clearly defined indications for supplementary anterior stabilization. Direct comparative evidence between posterior-only and combined anterior-posterior fixation remains scarce. This study evaluated whether institutional criteria reliably identify patients who benefit from additional percutaneous anterior fixation. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a level I trauma center and included adults with LC-1 fractures treated exclusively by percutaneous fixation. Combined anterior-posterior fixation was performed when predominant anterior pain and radiographic compromise indicated instability. Primary outcomes were pain trajectory (Numeric Rating Scale), inpatient opioid use, physiotherapy clearance, and ward mobility. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-seven patients were analyzed (combined = 14; posterior-only = 23). Preoperative pain was higher in the combined group (median 7 vs. 6; median difference 1 [95% CI 0 to 2]; <i>p</i> = 0.0036). Postoperatively, pain scores were lower in the combined group at 1-6 weeks (median difference -1 [95% CI -2 to 0]; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Opioid consumption was reduced (193 mg vs. 312 mg; median difference -200 mg [95% CI -280 to -120]; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and physiotherapy clearance occurred earlier (4 vs. 7 days; median difference -3 [95% CI -5 to -1]; <i>p</i> = 0.020). <b>Conclusion:</b> Our current indications to perform combined fixation were associated with favorable early outcomes in pain control and physiotherapy clearance among patients with LC-1 fractures showing anterior compromise. These results support a selective combined approach, though interpretation must remain cautious given the small retrospective cohort. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and refine patient selection.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(21)
Zagazig University (EG), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.