Socioeconomic, Demographic, and Provider Determinants of Staged Versus Concomitant Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence

Background: While concomitant surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) may benefit patients, variability exists in practice. A better understanding of the decision-making process regarding the placement of mid-urethral slings (MUSs) in women undergoing POP surgery is crucial for achieving equitable surgical planning and patient counselling. This study assessed factors associated with staged vs. concomitant SUI surgery in patients undergoing POP surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files from 2016 to 2020. The sample population consisted of female patients surgically treated for POP with staged (within 24 months) or concomitant mid-urethral sling (MUS). Data were merged with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Social Determinants of Health Database. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess independent associations between patient, location, and surgeon characteristics and the likelihood of staged versus concomitant procedures. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: Among 40,842 patients with POP surgery, 96.7% (39,440) had concomitant, while 3.4% (1,402) had staged MUS. Most were aged 65 - 74 years (67.2%), Caucasian (91.7%), from urban areas (91.9%), and had Charlson Comorbidity Index ≤ 3 (82.3%). A higher likelihood of staged surgery was seen in White vs. other racial groups (example OR: 1.50 vs. Black, 95% CI: 1.03 - 2.18); in the South vs. other regions (example OR: 1.55 vs. Northeast, 95% CI: 1.26 - 1.91); and for obstetrics/gynecology vs. urologic surgeons (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.02 - 1.40). Patients in counties with lower per capita income (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.03), lower proportions of foreign-born (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.05), limited English-speaking (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.05), or uninsured (< 64 years of age; OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00 - 1.03) households had higher likelihood of receiving staged surgery. Conclusions: This study identified several demographic, socioeconomic, and surgeon-related factors associated with staged vs. concomitant MUS procedures among patients undergoing surgery for POP. The reasons for these differences are not fully understood and may reflect various underlying factors, including differences in communication, regional or specialty norms, patient choice, or other factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo1521
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socioeconomic, Demographic, and Provider Determinants of Staged Versus Concomitant Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence

Shunaha Kim-Fine, Olubiyi Aworunse, Krista Reagan, Kristen A. Gerjevic et al.
Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
article

Socioeconomic, Demographic, and Provider Determinants of Staged Versus Concomitant Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence

Shunaha Kim-Fine, Olubiyi Aworunse, Krista Reagan, Kristen A. Gerjevic, Cara L. Grimes, Jaime B. Long, Sarah S. Boyd, Ryoko Sato
article en

Abstract

Background: While concomitant surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) may benefit patients, variability exists in practice. A better understanding of the decision-making process regarding the placement of mid-urethral slings (MUSs) in women undergoing POP surgery is crucial for achieving equitable surgical planning and patient counselling. This study assessed factors associated with staged vs. concomitant SUI surgery in patients undergoing POP surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files from 2016 to 2020. The sample population consisted of female patients surgically treated for POP with staged (within 24 months) or concomitant mid-urethral sling (MUS). Data were merged with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Social Determinants of Health Database. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess independent associations between patient, location, and surgeon characteristics and the likelihood of staged versus concomitant procedures. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: Among 40,842 patients with POP surgery, 96.7% (39,440) had concomitant, while 3.4% (1,402) had staged MUS. Most were aged 65 - 74 years (67.2%), Caucasian (91.7%), from urban areas (91.9%), and had Charlson Comorbidity Index ≤ 3 (82.3%). A higher likelihood of staged surgery was seen in White vs. other racial groups (example OR: 1.50 vs. Black, 95% CI: 1.03 - 2.18); in the South vs. other regions (example OR: 1.55 vs. Northeast, 95% CI: 1.26 - 1.91); and for obstetrics/gynecology vs. urologic surgeons (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.02 - 1.40). Patients in counties with lower per capita income (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.03), lower proportions of foreign-born (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.05), limited English-speaking (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.05), or uninsured (< 64 years of age; OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00 - 1.03) households had higher likelihood of receiving staged surgery. Conclusions: This study identified several demographic, socioeconomic, and surgeon-related factors associated with staged vs. concomitant MUS procedures among patients undergoing surgery for POP. The reasons for these differences are not fully understood and may reflect various underlying factors, including differences in communication, regional or specialty norms, patient choice, or other factors.

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and ObstetricsVol. 14(3)
Boston Scientific (Netherlands) (NL)
Boston Scientific Corporation
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.