Laboratory Quantification of Gaseous Emission from Alternative Fuel Combustion: Implications for Cement Industry Decarbonization

The cement industry accounts for approximately 7% of global CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, with fuel combustion contributing 40% of sectoral emissions. Alternative fuels from industrial and municipal waste offer emission reduction opportunities while addressing waste management challenges. This study quantifies real-time gaseous emissions (CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, NO<sub>x</sub>, and SO<sub>2</sub>) from seven alternative fuels-sawdust (SD), pecan nutshell (PNS), wind blade waste (WBW), industrial hose waste (IHW), tire-derived fuel (TDF), plastic waste (PW), and automotive shredder residue (ASR)-during calcination at 850 °C. Bituminous coal served as the reference fuel. Gas concentrations were continuously monitored using the testo 350 portable gas analyzer. Emission factors were calculated on a mass basis (kg/kg fuel) and energy basis (kg/GJ) for standardized comparisons. Alternative fuels consistently produced lower CO<sub>2</sub> emission factors than coal, with biomass-derived fuels (SD and PNS) showing reductions of 45% and 38%, respectively. Most alternative fuels generated lower CO and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions per unit energy due to their higher volatile matter content, promoting complete combustion. TDF was an exception, exhibiting 2.8 times higher CO emissions. SO<sub>2</sub> emissions were negligible except in the case of TDF (0.14% sulfur content). The measured emission factors were 15-30% lower than theoretical IPCC values, confirming the environmental viability of alternative fuels as coal substitutes in cement production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18214859
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laboratory Quantification of Gaseous Emission from Alternative Fuel Combustion: Implications for Cement Industry Decarbonization

Elías Ramírez Espinoza, J.E. Ledezma-Sillas, Carolina Prieto Gómez, Omar Farid Ojeda-Farias et al.
1 citations
Materials
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
0.67
article

Laboratory Quantification of Gaseous Emission from Alternative Fuel Combustion: Implications for Cement Industry Decarbonization

Elías Ramírez Espinoza, J.E. Ledezma-Sillas, Carolina Prieto Gómez, Omar Farid Ojeda-Farias, José Martin Herrera Ramírez, C. Carreño-Gallardo, Ofelia Rivera Sasso, Alberto Díaz Díaz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The cement industry accounts for approximately 7% of global CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, with fuel combustion contributing 40% of sectoral emissions. Alternative fuels from industrial and municipal waste offer emission reduction opportunities while addressing waste management challenges. This study quantifies real-time gaseous emissions (CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, NO<sub>x</sub>, and SO<sub>2</sub>) from seven alternative fuels-sawdust (SD), pecan nutshell (PNS), wind blade waste (WBW), industrial hose waste (IHW), tire-derived fuel (TDF), plastic waste (PW), and automotive shredder residue (ASR)-during calcination at 850 °C. Bituminous coal served as the reference fuel. Gas concentrations were continuously monitored using the testo 350 portable gas analyzer. Emission factors were calculated on a mass basis (kg/kg fuel) and energy basis (kg/GJ) for standardized comparisons. Alternative fuels consistently produced lower CO<sub>2</sub> emission factors than coal, with biomass-derived fuels (SD and PNS) showing reductions of 45% and 38%, respectively. Most alternative fuels generated lower CO and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions per unit energy due to their higher volatile matter content, promoting complete combustion. TDF was an exception, exhibiting 2.8 times higher CO emissions. SO<sub>2</sub> emissions were negligible except in the case of TDF (0.14% sulfur content). The measured emission factors were 15-30% lower than theoretical IPCC values, confirming the environmental viability of alternative fuels as coal substitutes in cement production.

MaterialsVol. 18(21)
Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.