Prediction of relevant exposure sources to aggregate chemical exposures from general and occupational environments: exploration of a decision tree approach

The findings indicated that the use of high- or medium-specification glove boxes, as forms of permanent encapsulation or encasing of the emission source, results in occupational exposure that is negligible compared with the exposure from consumer product use. When these glove boxes were used, hair spray exposure was the dominant source in 89% and 82% of cases, for high and medium specifications, respectively. A spraying activity with surface liquids performed outdoors (close to buildings) showed a significant trend toward occupational exposure dominance in 81% of cases. Using these three determinants, a three-layer quantitative decision tree was built to help users quickly decide whether aggregation was relevant before performing calculations. Aggregation was suggested in 91% of cases and avoided it in 9%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Work Exposures and Health
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaf062
Primary Topic
Chemical Safety and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of relevant exposure sources to aggregate chemical exposures from general and occupational environments: exploration of a decision tree approach

Katleen De Brouwere, Natalie von Goetz, David Vernez, Amélie Crépet et al.
Annals of Work Exposures and Health
Chemical Safety and Risk Management
article

Prediction of relevant exposure sources to aggregate chemical exposures from general and occupational environments: exploration of a decision tree approach

Katleen De Brouwere, Natalie von Goetz, David Vernez, Amélie Crépet, Ilse Ottenbros, Clément Blassiau, Hasnaa Chettou
article en

Abstract

The findings indicated that the use of high- or medium-specification glove boxes, as forms of permanent encapsulation or encasing of the emission source, results in occupational exposure that is negligible compared with the exposure from consumer product use. When these glove boxes were used, hair spray exposure was the dominant source in 89% and 82% of cases, for high and medium specifications, respectively. A spraying activity with surface liquids performed outdoors (close to buildings) showed a significant trend toward occupational exposure dominance in 81% of cases. Using these three determinants, a three-layer quantitative decision tree was built to help users quickly decide whether aggregation was relevant before performing calculations. Aggregation was suggested in 91% of cases and avoided it in 9%.

Annals of Work Exposures and HealthVol. 70(1)
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL), Federal Office of Public Health (CH), Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail (FR), Centre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne (CH), Flemish Institute for Technological Research (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Chemical Safety and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Prediction of relevant exposure sources to aggregate chemical exposures from general and occupational environments: exploration of a decision tree approach — Katleen De Brouwere, Natalie von Goetz, et al. · Annals of Work Exposures and Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS