Association of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli Virulence Genes and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in an Interface Model of Swine Colonization and Human Diarrhea in Mexico

The accelerated spread of antimicrobial resistance, driven by the misuse of antibiotics in the context of 'One Health', is a public health concern worldwide due to the increasing number of human infections associated with foodborne and/or environmental pathogens, including multidrug-resistant <i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>E. coli</i>). Monitoring pathogenic and multidrug-resistant <i>E. coli</i> isolates is essential for sustainable disease management in swine and human diarrhea cases. This study was designed to assess the multidrug resistance (MDR) profiles and virulence-associated gene (pathotypes) frequency of pathogenic and commensal <i>E. coli</i> strains by antimicrobial susceptibility testing and endpoint PCR among 983 <i>E. coli</i> isolates from swine fecal material and 425 stool isolates from human diarrhea cases, obtained from a closely monitored population between March 2015 and April 2016. Our results reveal that >50% of <i>E. coli</i> strains isolated from swine were resistant to nalidixic acid (78.94%), tetracycline (72%), ampicillin (55.54%), and co-trimoxazole (53.91%), and that, in humans, the highest resistance was observed in tetracycline (71.77%), nalidixic acid (65.41%), ampicillin (57.88%), and co-trimoxazole (53.88%). A lower frequency of resistance to ciprofloxacin was demonstrated in both swine (23.4%) and humans (15.3%), and minimal resistance to third-generation cephalosporins, ceftazidime (2.54%), and cefotaxime (2.44%) was observed in swine; however, resistance to these cephalosporins is much higher at 14.6% and 11.53% in humans. Among the pathotypes, EPEC was the most predominant (70.97%) in swine and DAEC (40%) in humans. In addition, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis separates the <i>E. coli</i> isolates into 22 patterns. Pathotypes such as EPEC and EHEC in swine highlight the need for surveillance and control in animal production to prevent zoonotic transmission. These results suggest that swine could act as a reservoir in human infection and that antimicrobial resistance could be transferred to humans from swine. Although we did not find clonal dissemination between the human and swine strains, the spread of similar multi-resistance profiles was observed, thus suggesting that multidrug resistance has been widely selected in this closed environment and may pose a public health risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microorganisms
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13112436
Primary Topic
Escherichia coli research studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli Virulence Genes and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in an Interface Model of Swine Colonization and Human Diarrhea in Mexico

Celia Alpuche‐Aranda, Hugo López‐Gatell, Elsa Tamayo-Legorreta, Eduardo Moreno-Vazquez et al.
Microorganisms
Escherichia coli research studies
article

Association of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli Virulence Genes and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in an Interface Model of Swine Colonization and Human Diarrhea in Mexico

Celia Alpuche‐Aranda, Hugo López‐Gatell, Elsa Tamayo-Legorreta, Eduardo Moreno-Vazquez, Fabián Téllez-Figueroa, Jackeline Cerón-Lopez, Rosa M. Medina-Julián
article en

Abstract

The accelerated spread of antimicrobial resistance, driven by the misuse of antibiotics in the context of 'One Health', is a public health concern worldwide due to the increasing number of human infections associated with foodborne and/or environmental pathogens, including multidrug-resistant <i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>E. coli</i>). Monitoring pathogenic and multidrug-resistant <i>E. coli</i> isolates is essential for sustainable disease management in swine and human diarrhea cases. This study was designed to assess the multidrug resistance (MDR) profiles and virulence-associated gene (pathotypes) frequency of pathogenic and commensal <i>E. coli</i> strains by antimicrobial susceptibility testing and endpoint PCR among 983 <i>E. coli</i> isolates from swine fecal material and 425 stool isolates from human diarrhea cases, obtained from a closely monitored population between March 2015 and April 2016. Our results reveal that >50% of <i>E. coli</i> strains isolated from swine were resistant to nalidixic acid (78.94%), tetracycline (72%), ampicillin (55.54%), and co-trimoxazole (53.91%), and that, in humans, the highest resistance was observed in tetracycline (71.77%), nalidixic acid (65.41%), ampicillin (57.88%), and co-trimoxazole (53.88%). A lower frequency of resistance to ciprofloxacin was demonstrated in both swine (23.4%) and humans (15.3%), and minimal resistance to third-generation cephalosporins, ceftazidime (2.54%), and cefotaxime (2.44%) was observed in swine; however, resistance to these cephalosporins is much higher at 14.6% and 11.53% in humans. Among the pathotypes, EPEC was the most predominant (70.97%) in swine and DAEC (40%) in humans. In addition, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis separates the <i>E. coli</i> isolates into 22 patterns. Pathotypes such as EPEC and EHEC in swine highlight the need for surveillance and control in animal production to prevent zoonotic transmission. These results suggest that swine could act as a reservoir in human infection and that antimicrobial resistance could be transferred to humans from swine. Although we did not find clonal dissemination between the human and swine strains, the spread of similar multi-resistance profiles was observed, thus suggesting that multidrug resistance has been widely selected in this closed environment and may pose a public health risk.

MicroorganismsVol. 13(11)
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (MX), Universidad Politecnica del Estado de Morelos (MX)
Instituto Nacional De Salud Pública
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Escherichia coli research studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.