Monitoring of (Leukemia-Specific) Immune Cells in Stages, Treatment Groups and in the Course of Disease and Therapy Contributes to Qualify Antileukemic Potential and Survival in Patients with AML

Various AML treatment regimens might trigger different immunological mechanisms against leukemic cells. The role of different immune cell subsets in the mediation of antileukemic processes is not clear. In this study, we longitudinally assessed (leukemia specific) immune subtype compositions in 17 AML patients before stem cell transplantation (SCT) at different timepoints in the course and in different stages of the disease using flow cytometry. Further we correlated immune cell compositions with patients' response to induction therapy and the median survival (3.8 months in our cohort) of the patients. Finally, we compared immune cell profiles from patients before and after SCT. (1) Patients in CR (compared to dgn and PD) were characterized by higher frequencies of leukemia-derived DC (DCleu), (leukemia-specific-IFNg or TNFα producing or CD107a degranulating) anti-tumor relevant T cells (Tgd, Tβ7), central/effector memory cells (Tcm, Tem), alongside with lower frequencies of (leukemia-specific) regulatory T cells. (2) Patients with higher frequencies of (leukemia-specific) antitumor relevant T cells, (leukemia-specific) memory T cells and NK cells demonstrated a prolonged median survival time and/or responded better to induction (RTI) treatment (3) Comparing patients before and after SCT, only minimal differences were observed. However, patients in CR<sub>preSCT</sub> exhibited higher frequencies of DC, Tcm, Tβ7 and leukemia-specific iNKT cells compared to patients in CR<sub>postSCT</sub>. (1) Immune monitoring qualifies to quantify (leukemia-specific) immune cells in different stages and under different treatment strategies in the course of AML. (2) Higher frequencies of activating and antitumor relevant leukemia-specific immune cell subtypes found after 'costimulatory' (especially KitM induced) treatment' and in CR. (3) In particular, DC/DCleu, (leukemia-specific) antitumor-relevant T (memory) and NK cells seem to dominate in CR and positively influence RTI and survival. (4) Monitoring of (leukemia-specific) immune cell subtypes contribute to quantify individual AML patients' antileukemic potential in different stages and treatment groups and also could be used to predict patients' survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110336
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring of (Leukemia-Specific) Immune Cells in Stages, Treatment Groups and in the Course of Disease and Therapy Contributes to Qualify Antileukemic Potential and Survival in Patients with AML

Anne Hartz, Giuliano Filippini Velázquez, Philipp Anand, Joerg Uwe Schmohl et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
1.77
article

Monitoring of (Leukemia-Specific) Immune Cells in Stages, Treatment Groups and in the Course of Disease and Therapy Contributes to Qualify Antileukemic Potential and Survival in Patients with AML

Anne Hartz, Giuliano Filippini Velázquez, Philipp Anand, Joerg Uwe Schmohl, Peter Bojko, Christoph Schmid, Xiaojia Feng, Linus Kruk, Helga Schmetzer, Marianne Unterfrauner, Julian Stein, Nicolas Schmieder, Joudi Abdulmajid
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Various AML treatment regimens might trigger different immunological mechanisms against leukemic cells. The role of different immune cell subsets in the mediation of antileukemic processes is not clear. In this study, we longitudinally assessed (leukemia specific) immune subtype compositions in 17 AML patients before stem cell transplantation (SCT) at different timepoints in the course and in different stages of the disease using flow cytometry. Further we correlated immune cell compositions with patients' response to induction therapy and the median survival (3.8 months in our cohort) of the patients. Finally, we compared immune cell profiles from patients before and after SCT. (1) Patients in CR (compared to dgn and PD) were characterized by higher frequencies of leukemia-derived DC (DCleu), (leukemia-specific-IFNg or TNFα producing or CD107a degranulating) anti-tumor relevant T cells (Tgd, Tβ7), central/effector memory cells (Tcm, Tem), alongside with lower frequencies of (leukemia-specific) regulatory T cells. (2) Patients with higher frequencies of (leukemia-specific) antitumor relevant T cells, (leukemia-specific) memory T cells and NK cells demonstrated a prolonged median survival time and/or responded better to induction (RTI) treatment (3) Comparing patients before and after SCT, only minimal differences were observed. However, patients in CR<sub>preSCT</sub> exhibited higher frequencies of DC, Tcm, Tβ7 and leukemia-specific iNKT cells compared to patients in CR<sub>postSCT</sub>. (1) Immune monitoring qualifies to quantify (leukemia-specific) immune cells in different stages and under different treatment strategies in the course of AML. (2) Higher frequencies of activating and antitumor relevant leukemia-specific immune cell subtypes found after 'costimulatory' (especially KitM induced) treatment' and in CR. (3) In particular, DC/DCleu, (leukemia-specific) antitumor-relevant T (memory) and NK cells seem to dominate in CR and positively influence RTI and survival. (4) Monitoring of (leukemia-specific) immune cell subtypes contribute to quantify individual AML patients' antileukemic potential in different stages and treatment groups and also could be used to predict patients' survival.

International Journal of Molecular SciencesVol. 26(21)
Bielefeld University (DE), University Hospital Augsburg (DE), München Klinik (DE), Rotkreuzklinikum München (DE), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen (DE), Diakonie-Klinikum Stuttgart (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
1.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.