Implementing a Structured Head and Neck Cancer Care Pathway in an Electronic Health Record: Iterative Process and Effects on Data Quality

The digital availability of health data not only improves processes in primary care, but it also facilitates the evaluation of healthcare delivery. Nevertheless, the preprocessing of data for secondary use is still time-consuming and expensive, particularly in head and neck cancer (HNC), where patients undergo complex multidisciplinary treatment trajectories. Therefore, we have looked further into the effects on data quantity and quality following the implementation of structured care pathways. Leveraging data extracted from these care pathways, we assessed the potential of real-time quality-of-care evaluation through dashboards, incorporating indicators such as a proposed "textbook process" model.Our mixed methods study assessed the value of a newly implemented structured HNC pathway and its effect on data quantity and quality through three processes: (1) A qualitative assessment of current barriers, data registration processes, and data-interpretation discrepancies with in-house data managers. (2) A prospective pilot (<i>n</i> = 41) in which patient data is registered both manually and semi-automatically. (3) An evaluation of the patient journey through dashboards with real-time indicators 1 year after go-live.During the iterative implementation phase of the structured care pathway, data completeness and correctness averaged 84.8 and 88.4%, respectively. The new method reduced registration time by 3.7 minutes per patient. A majority of 87.8% followed all four defined time points of the structured care pathway. One year after implementation and in-house validation, time-to-treatment intervals could be tracked, and processes could be adapted accordingly.A structured care pathway, followed by early implementation guided by a multidisciplinary team, forms the foundation for sustainable data capturing for multiple purposes, including quality registries. In-house dashboards further enhance data quality and process improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Clinical Informatics
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2725-6117
Primary Topic
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing a Structured Head and Neck Cancer Care Pathway in an Electronic Health Record: Iterative Process and Effects on Data Quality

Dominique V.C. de Jel, Josephine van Koevorden
Applied Clinical Informatics
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
article

Implementing a Structured Head and Neck Cancer Care Pathway in an Electronic Health Record: Iterative Process and Effects on Data Quality

Dominique V.C. de Jel, Josephine van Koevorden
article en

Abstract

The digital availability of health data not only improves processes in primary care, but it also facilitates the evaluation of healthcare delivery. Nevertheless, the preprocessing of data for secondary use is still time-consuming and expensive, particularly in head and neck cancer (HNC), where patients undergo complex multidisciplinary treatment trajectories. Therefore, we have looked further into the effects on data quantity and quality following the implementation of structured care pathways. Leveraging data extracted from these care pathways, we assessed the potential of real-time quality-of-care evaluation through dashboards, incorporating indicators such as a proposed "textbook process" model.Our mixed methods study assessed the value of a newly implemented structured HNC pathway and its effect on data quantity and quality through three processes: (1) A qualitative assessment of current barriers, data registration processes, and data-interpretation discrepancies with in-house data managers. (2) A prospective pilot (<i>n</i> = 41) in which patient data is registered both manually and semi-automatically. (3) An evaluation of the patient journey through dashboards with real-time indicators 1 year after go-live.During the iterative implementation phase of the structured care pathway, data completeness and correctness averaged 84.8 and 88.4%, respectively. The new method reduced registration time by 3.7 minutes per patient. A majority of 87.8% followed all four defined time points of the structured care pathway. One year after implementation and in-house validation, time-to-treatment intervals could be tracked, and processes could be adapted accordingly.A structured care pathway, followed by early implementation guided by a multidisciplinary team, forms the foundation for sustainable data capturing for multiple purposes, including quality registries. In-house dashboards further enhance data quality and process improvement.

Applied Clinical InformaticsVol. 16(05)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Dutch Cancer Society (NL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Oncode Institute (NL), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.