Applied machine learning for nociceptive pain detection using EEG spectral features

<i>Objective</i>. This study explores a more reliable method for measuring nociceptive pain induced by laser stimuli from electroencephalography (EEG) signals, addressing the limitations of fixed pain scales by incorporating inter-individual variability in subjective pain tolerance.<i>Approach</i>. For this purpose, a public database was used that includes recordings from 51 subjects who received controlled laser stimuli at three different intensities on the back of the hand to evoke pain, while EEG activity was simultaneously recorded. Signal processing techniques were then applied to extract power in six frequency bands (e.g., alpha, beta, gamma). The extracted features were fed into machine learning algorithms to predict pain levels. This prediction was performed by comparing two data labeling strategies (reaction time versus laser intensity) and two different EEG channel configurations (62 channels versus 20 somatosensory channels).<i>Main results</i>. The power of EEG frequency bands, combined with machine learning, distinguished pre-stimulus from in-stimulus conditions with an average accuracy of 86%. Classification across pain levels was more challenging, reaching a maximum of 63% in the binary discrimination between high and low pain. The 62-channel configuration and the 20-channel somatosensory setup showed similar performance, although in some cases the 62-channel setup yielded better results. Incorporating temporal information from reaction times further improved performance, with time-based labels significantly outperforming intensity-based labels.<i>Significance</i>. Our results indicate that the best labeling system for predicting nociceptive pain levels is that one based on reaction time (<i>p</i>-value < 0.001; two-sided Student's t-test), thus suggesting that pain perception is subjective and that classifying pain solely based on stimulus intensity may not be reliable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ae16ad
Primary Topic
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applied machine learning for nociceptive pain detection using EEG spectral features

Rogelio Sotero Reyes-Galaviz, Camilo E. Valderrama, Luis Villaseñor-Pineda
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
article

Applied machine learning for nociceptive pain detection using EEG spectral features

Rogelio Sotero Reyes-Galaviz, Camilo E. Valderrama, Luis Villaseñor-Pineda
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective</i>. This study explores a more reliable method for measuring nociceptive pain induced by laser stimuli from electroencephalography (EEG) signals, addressing the limitations of fixed pain scales by incorporating inter-individual variability in subjective pain tolerance.<i>Approach</i>. For this purpose, a public database was used that includes recordings from 51 subjects who received controlled laser stimuli at three different intensities on the back of the hand to evoke pain, while EEG activity was simultaneously recorded. Signal processing techniques were then applied to extract power in six frequency bands (e.g., alpha, beta, gamma). The extracted features were fed into machine learning algorithms to predict pain levels. This prediction was performed by comparing two data labeling strategies (reaction time versus laser intensity) and two different EEG channel configurations (62 channels versus 20 somatosensory channels).<i>Main results</i>. The power of EEG frequency bands, combined with machine learning, distinguished pre-stimulus from in-stimulus conditions with an average accuracy of 86%. Classification across pain levels was more challenging, reaching a maximum of 63% in the binary discrimination between high and low pain. The 62-channel configuration and the 20-channel somatosensory setup showed similar performance, although in some cases the 62-channel setup yielded better results. Incorporating temporal information from reaction times further improved performance, with time-based labels significantly outperforming intensity-based labels.<i>Significance</i>. Our results indicate that the best labeling system for predicting nociceptive pain levels is that one based on reaction time (<i>p</i>-value < 0.001; two-sided Student's t-test), thus suggesting that pain perception is subjective and that classifying pain solely based on stimulus intensity may not be reliable.

Biomedical Physics & Engineering ExpressVol. 11(6)
University of Calgary (CA), National Institute of Astrophysics, Optics and Electronics (MX), Universidad de Puebla (MX), Universidad Anáhuac Puebla (MX), Universidad Hispana (MX), The University of Winnipeg (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.