How does the optimal constant of the Carleman estimate depend on the size of the observation boundary?

Abstract In this paper, we would like to elucidate the question of the Carleman estimate constants dependency on the size of the observation boundary. This allows to quantify the effect of measurements uncertainty with respect to the size of the observation boundary in many inverse and control problems. We take an example of an inverse source problem for a parabolic equation and explicitly calculate Lipschitz stability constants that appears in the L 2 -estimate of the source function. We deliberately construct a class of space dependent weight functions that depend on the measurement boundary size. Then we identify the optimal weight function that allows to minimize the stability constant. Using our approach, we found that when the measurement boundary covers 80% or more of the domain boundary, we can explicitly provide the formula of the optimal constant. When the measurement boundary is less than 80%, we are not able to find the explicit formula of the optimal expression, but we are able to numerically approximate the optimal constant. This paper presents meticulous calculations that require a rigorous and careful reading to fully comprehend the technical intricacies of the analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Inverse Problems
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/ae16cd
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How does the optimal constant of the Carleman estimate depend on the size of the observation boundary?

Néjib Zemzemi, Hamza Ammar, Moncef Mahjoub
Inverse Problems
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
article

How does the optimal constant of the Carleman estimate depend on the size of the observation boundary?

Néjib Zemzemi, Hamza Ammar, Moncef Mahjoub
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we would like to elucidate the question of the Carleman estimate constants dependency on the size of the observation boundary. This allows to quantify the effect of measurements uncertainty with respect to the size of the observation boundary in many inverse and control problems. We take an example of an inverse source problem for a parabolic equation and explicitly calculate Lipschitz stability constants that appears in the L 2 -estimate of the source function. We deliberately construct a class of space dependent weight functions that depend on the measurement boundary size. Then we identify the optimal weight function that allows to minimize the stability constant. Using our approach, we found that when the measurement boundary covers 80% or more of the domain boundary, we can explicitly provide the formula of the optimal constant. When the measurement boundary is less than 80%, we are not able to find the explicit formula of the optimal expression, but we are able to numerically approximate the optimal constant. This paper presents meticulous calculations that require a rigorous and careful reading to fully comprehend the technical intricacies of the analysis.

Inverse ProblemsVol. 41(11)
Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque (FR), Tunis El Manar University (TN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How does the optimal constant of the Carleman estimate depend on the size of the observation boundary? — Néjib Zemzemi, Hamza Ammar, et al. · Inverse Problems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS